The German Communities That Care Youth Survey: dimensionality and validity of risk factors

Overall, the results indicate that most risk factors demonstrate unidimensionality and are valid in terms of concurrent criterion validity. Although some risk factors were not correlated with every outcome, they still predicted most outcomes, suggesting that the CTC Youth Survey is a viable tool for communities to assess their community risk profile. Risk factors that did not demonstrate unidimensionality or concurrent criterion validity should be monitored in future surveys and interpreted with caution until further evidence is available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472347
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The German Communities That Care Youth Survey: dimensionality and validity of risk factors

Maren Reder, Renate Soellner, Ronja A. Runge, Helge Schlüter
1 citations
Frontiers in Public Health
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
0.64
article

The German Communities That Care Youth Survey: dimensionality and validity of risk factors

Maren Reder, Renate Soellner, Ronja A. Runge, Helge Schlüter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Overall, the results indicate that most risk factors demonstrate unidimensionality and are valid in terms of concurrent criterion validity. Although some risk factors were not correlated with every outcome, they still predicted most outcomes, suggesting that the CTC Youth Survey is a viable tool for communities to assess their community risk profile. Risk factors that did not demonstrate unidimensionality or concurrent criterion validity should be monitored in future surveys and interpreted with caution until further evidence is available.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 12
University of Hildesheim (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.