Ordinary Users Do Not Understand Digital Signatures

Ordinary Internet users struggle to verify the identity and commitment of others online. Although digital signatures could reliably solve this problem, users rarely use, understand, or verify them. For effective use of digital signatures, their implementation needs to align with ordinary users’ mental models of digital signatures. This paper is the first to explore these mental models through 20 semi-structured interviews. Participants’ mental models of digital signatures were found to be highly context-sensitive and inconsistent within participants. Still, two consistent perceived purposes emerged, where digital signatures are used only for expressing one’s identity, or also for expressing their agreement. We discuss that these ‘It’s me’ and ‘I Agree’ models are an identity-based interpretation of digital signatures. We discuss four emerged obstacles to the adoption of digital signatures with suggestions for future research and pose design recommendations for more usable (1) digital signature tools and (2) secure communication tools in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685402
Citations
1
Primary Topic
User Authentication and Security Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ordinary Users Do Not Understand Digital Signatures

Jorrit Geels
1 citations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
User Authentication and Security Systems
0.57
article

Ordinary Users Do Not Understand Digital Signatures

Jorrit Geels
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ordinary Internet users struggle to verify the identity and commitment of others online. Although digital signatures could reliably solve this problem, users rarely use, understand, or verify them. For effective use of digital signatures, their implementation needs to align with ordinary users’ mental models of digital signatures. This paper is the first to explore these mental models through 20 semi-structured interviews. Participants’ mental models of digital signatures were found to be highly context-sensitive and inconsistent within participants. Still, two consistent perceived purposes emerged, where digital signatures are used only for expressing one’s identity, or also for expressing their agreement. We discuss that these ‘It’s me’ and ‘I Agree’ models are an identity-based interpretation of digital signatures. We discuss four emerged obstacles to the adoption of digital signatures with suggestions for future research and pose design recommendations for more usable (1) digital signature tools and (2) secure communication tools in general.

Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
User Authentication and Security Systems
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.