How to increase transparency and trust in internet voting systems: An experimental study

A lack of transparency in internet voting systems – in particular, how the integrity of the election result is ensured – has been commonly mentioned as one of the main barriers to its adoption. We conduct an empirical study (N = 940) evaluating the factors affecting the voters’ perception of transparency and trust in an internet voting system. Thereby, we adopt a proposal from prior research that conceptualizes transparency as consisting of several individual dimensions. Our study shows that the transparency dimensions of information availability, understandability, and verifiability have a significant positive effect on voters’ perception towards the general transparency of the voting system, and also that transparency has a positive effect on trust in the system. In addition, we investigate how the information presented about the system and the procedures available to voters for verifying the integrity of their cast vote affects voters’ perception of transparency and trust in the system. We find that providing technical documentation about the system significantly increases perceived transparency and trust. We conclude that while such information is unlikely to be understood by most voters, it effectively signals the possibility of expert audits of the system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685362
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to increase transparency and trust in internet voting systems: An experimental study

Asmita Dalela, Samuel Agbesi, Oksana Kulyk, Jurlind Budurushi et al.
3 citations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
0.45
article

How to increase transparency and trust in internet voting systems: An experimental study

Asmita Dalela, Samuel Agbesi, Oksana Kulyk, Jurlind Budurushi, Christina Nissen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A lack of transparency in internet voting systems – in particular, how the integrity of the election result is ensured – has been commonly mentioned as one of the main barriers to its adoption. We conduct an empirical study (N = 940) evaluating the factors affecting the voters’ perception of transparency and trust in an internet voting system. Thereby, we adopt a proposal from prior research that conceptualizes transparency as consisting of several individual dimensions. Our study shows that the transparency dimensions of information availability, understandability, and verifiability have a significant positive effect on voters’ perception towards the general transparency of the voting system, and also that transparency has a positive effect on trust in the system. In addition, we investigate how the information presented about the system and the procedures available to voters for verifying the integrity of their cast vote affects voters’ perception of transparency and trust in the system. We find that providing technical documentation about the system significantly increases perceived transparency and trust. We conclude that while such information is unlikely to be understood by most voters, it effectively signals the possibility of expert audits of the system.

Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DE), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.