Navigating the Paradox: Challenges of Designing Technology for Nonhumans

Given the disproportionate impact of human activity on the Earth's ecosystem, the planet is undergoing alarming changes. In this paper, we present seven technology concepts created by Master's students that address this imbalance by advocating for nonhuman interests, such as tree representatives in parliaments, or a technological bat fighting for biodiversity with seed bombs. We analyzed the concepts and found three main categories: (1) allowing interspecies relations, (2) allowing intraspecies relations, or (3) allowing no relations. Moreover, we identified one main paradox for each concept, such as “preserving interdependent beings by separating them” and “conserving ‘the wild’ by taming it.” These seven paradoxes represent two underlying challenges: (1) to overcome the human perspective, and (2) to practice relational thinking. By discussing the limits, ambiguities, and tensions of designing for nonhumans, the paper contributes to a growing body of research in HCI that designs for more-than-human in the context of sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685363
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Paradox: Challenges of Designing Technology for Nonhumans

Marc Hassenzahl, Matthias Laschke, Judith Dörrenbächer, Madlen Kneile
6 citations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.55
article

Navigating the Paradox: Challenges of Designing Technology for Nonhumans

Marc Hassenzahl, Matthias Laschke, Judith Dörrenbächer, Madlen Kneile
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Given the disproportionate impact of human activity on the Earth's ecosystem, the planet is undergoing alarming changes. In this paper, we present seven technology concepts created by Master's students that address this imbalance by advocating for nonhuman interests, such as tree representatives in parliaments, or a technological bat fighting for biodiversity with seed bombs. We analyzed the concepts and found three main categories: (1) allowing interspecies relations, (2) allowing intraspecies relations, or (3) allowing no relations. Moreover, we identified one main paradox for each concept, such as “preserving interdependent beings by separating them” and “conserving ‘the wild’ by taming it.” These seven paradoxes represent two underlying challenges: (1) to overcome the human perspective, and (2) to practice relational thinking. By discussing the limits, ambiguities, and tensions of designing for nonhumans, the paper contributes to a growing body of research in HCI that designs for more-than-human in the context of sustainability.

Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
University of Siegen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.