Barriers to Change: A Collective Case Study of Four Universities’ Efforts to Advance Faculty Diversity and Inclusion

This collective case study documents four research universities’ efforts to advance faculty diversity and inclusion on their campuses. Informed by the campus racial climate framework, our research team offers identifies two broad categories of barriers, including structural barriers and active barriers. Structural barriers included institutional history, organizational silos, and a sedimented culture of decentralization whereas active barriers revolved around activist, governing bodies, skeptical faculty, and administrators and faculty refusal to engage in diversity efforts at all. We conclude by discussing the unique implications of each type of barrier and the utility of distinguishing between structural and active barriers. Finally, we consider how our findings connect to, complicate, and extend the established literature on organizational change and the campus racial climate framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovative Higher Education
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09742-4
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to Change: A Collective Case Study of Four Universities’ Efforts to Advance Faculty Diversity and Inclusion

Travis H. Olson, Kimberly A. Griffin, Leslie D. Gonzales, Stephanie M. Breen
7 citations
Innovative Higher Education
Higher Education Research Studies
14.67
article

Barriers to Change: A Collective Case Study of Four Universities’ Efforts to Advance Faculty Diversity and Inclusion

Travis H. Olson, Kimberly A. Griffin, Leslie D. Gonzales, Stephanie M. Breen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This collective case study documents four research universities’ efforts to advance faculty diversity and inclusion on their campuses. Informed by the campus racial climate framework, our research team offers identifies two broad categories of barriers, including structural barriers and active barriers. Structural barriers included institutional history, organizational silos, and a sedimented culture of decentralization whereas active barriers revolved around activist, governing bodies, skeptical faculty, and administrators and faculty refusal to engage in diversity efforts at all. We conclude by discussing the unique implications of each type of barrier and the utility of distinguishing between structural and active barriers. Finally, we consider how our findings connect to, complicate, and extend the established literature on organizational change and the campus racial climate framework.

Innovative Higher EducationVol. 50(2)
Arizona Department of Education (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education Research Studies
14.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.