A novel methodology to develop low‐intensity psychological treatments

Abstract Introduction Only a minority of individuals with mental health disorders receive specialist treatment. Low‐intensity psychological therapies, like guided self‐help, have the potential to bridge this global treatment gap. However, a systematic process for developing such therapies has not been proposed. This study proposes a systematic process for developing low‐intensity psychological treatments, exemplified by a low‐intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention for children and young people with eating disorders. Methods A systematic, three‐step process is presented. Firstly, a common elements analysis is conducted within the three pillars of evidence‐based practice (research, clinical expertise, and patient preferences). Secondly, a coding matrix is used to synthesize the common elements across these three pillars. Finally, patient and public involvement (PPI) feedback is incorporated for intervention refinement. Results Applying this methodology led to the development of an eight‐module, low intensity CBT intervention for children and young people with eating disorders, covering topics such as regular eating, body image, social media, and managing emotional triggers. Conclusion The intervention derived from this novel methodology is evidence‐informed and considers implementation into routine practice from the outset. This systematic approach to developing low intensity psychological interventions holds promise for closing the treatment gap irrespective of therapeutic orientation or disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health Science
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.91
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel methodology to develop low‐intensity psychological treatments

Emily Davey, Nadia Micali, Sophie D. Bennett, Roz Shafran et al.
1 citations
Mental Health Science
Mental Health Research Topics
0.51
article

A novel methodology to develop low‐intensity psychological treatments

Emily Davey, Nadia Micali, Sophie D. Bennett, Roz Shafran, Rachel Bryant‐Waugh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Only a minority of individuals with mental health disorders receive specialist treatment. Low‐intensity psychological therapies, like guided self‐help, have the potential to bridge this global treatment gap. However, a systematic process for developing such therapies has not been proposed. This study proposes a systematic process for developing low‐intensity psychological treatments, exemplified by a low‐intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention for children and young people with eating disorders. Methods A systematic, three‐step process is presented. Firstly, a common elements analysis is conducted within the three pillars of evidence‐based practice (research, clinical expertise, and patient preferences). Secondly, a coding matrix is used to synthesize the common elements across these three pillars. Finally, patient and public involvement (PPI) feedback is incorporated for intervention refinement. Results Applying this methodology led to the development of an eight‐module, low intensity CBT intervention for children and young people with eating disorders, covering topics such as regular eating, body image, social media, and managing emotional triggers. Conclusion The intervention derived from this novel methodology is evidence‐informed and considers implementation into routine practice from the outset. This systematic approach to developing low intensity psychological interventions holds promise for closing the treatment gap irrespective of therapeutic orientation or disorder.

Mental Health ScienceVol. 2(4)
King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Mental Health Services (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), University College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Mental Health Research Topics
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.