Propofol sedation safety concerns in pediatric endoscopy: Special considerations in the Japanese medical environment

To the Editor, Kudo and colleagues1 clearly demonstrated that intravenous propofol anesthesia significantly shortened procedure time in pediatric endoscopy, with no adverse events observed. Subsequent to the revision of Japanese guidelines for endoscopic sedation,2 gradual adoption of propofol sedation in adult endoscopic procedures is noted. Importantly, however, this guideline explicitly excludes pediatric populations. Additionally, this guideline refrains from explicitly stating whether non-anesthesiologists can safely administer propofol sedation in endoscopy units. Gastroenterologists should understand that propofol is not recommended for anesthetic induction below the age of 3 years or for anesthetic maintenance below 2 months of age. As discussed in this paper, propofol is contraindicated for pediatric intensive care unit sedation due to the risk of propofol infusion syndrome; thus, excessive use should be avoided. Actually, our hospital witnessed an accidental intensive care unit death of a pediatric patient sedated with propofol. Our concern stems from the fact that current evidence regarding safe propofol sedation for endoscopy is based predominantly on international reports. The Japanese medical environment differs significantly from those abroad. While anesthesiologists in many other countries routinely administer sedation, the current structure and resource allocation in Japan makes it practically infeasible to have anesthesiologists permanently stationed in endoscopy units. Unlike benzodiazepines, propofol has a narrow pharmacological range between states of sedation with maintained respiration and that of general anesthesia where spontaneous breathing ceases, making it prone to easily induce over-sedation. Therefore, the guideline also emphasizes the use of various devices supporting safe propofol administration; consequently, continuous administration via a target-controlled infusion pump is recommended, and the importance of capnography and/or electroencephalography is stressed (in Japan, widespread adoption of this monitoring in pediatric patients is insufficient). The methodology in Kudo et al.1 did not address these recommendations. Given the aforementioned precautions for propofol use in pediatric patients, endoscopic sedation in children using propofol warrants more careful consideration, prioritizing safety. The authors acknowledge Prof. David W. Grainger (University of Utah, USA) for invaluable technical comments. None. - Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: N/A. - Informed consent: N/A. - Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A. - Animal studies: N/A.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DEN Open
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70000
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Propofol sedation safety concerns in pediatric endoscopy: Special considerations in the Japanese medical environment

Masayuki Yamato, Daisuke Murakami
DEN Open
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Propofol sedation safety concerns in pediatric endoscopy: Special considerations in the Japanese medical environment

Masayuki Yamato, Daisuke Murakami
article en

Abstract

To the Editor, Kudo and colleagues1 clearly demonstrated that intravenous propofol anesthesia significantly shortened procedure time in pediatric endoscopy, with no adverse events observed. Subsequent to the revision of Japanese guidelines for endoscopic sedation,2 gradual adoption of propofol sedation in adult endoscopic procedures is noted. Importantly, however, this guideline explicitly excludes pediatric populations. Additionally, this guideline refrains from explicitly stating whether non-anesthesiologists can safely administer propofol sedation in endoscopy units. Gastroenterologists should understand that propofol is not recommended for anesthetic induction below the age of 3 years or for anesthetic maintenance below 2 months of age. As discussed in this paper, propofol is contraindicated for pediatric intensive care unit sedation due to the risk of propofol infusion syndrome; thus, excessive use should be avoided. Actually, our hospital witnessed an accidental intensive care unit death of a pediatric patient sedated with propofol. Our concern stems from the fact that current evidence regarding safe propofol sedation for endoscopy is based predominantly on international reports. The Japanese medical environment differs significantly from those abroad. While anesthesiologists in many other countries routinely administer sedation, the current structure and resource allocation in Japan makes it practically infeasible to have anesthesiologists permanently stationed in endoscopy units. Unlike benzodiazepines, propofol has a narrow pharmacological range between states of sedation with maintained respiration and that of general anesthesia where spontaneous breathing ceases, making it prone to easily induce over-sedation. Therefore, the guideline also emphasizes the use of various devices supporting safe propofol administration; consequently, continuous administration via a target-controlled infusion pump is recommended, and the importance of capnography and/or electroencephalography is stressed (in Japan, widespread adoption of this monitoring in pediatric patients is insufficient). The methodology in Kudo et al.1 did not address these recommendations. Given the aforementioned precautions for propofol use in pediatric patients, endoscopic sedation in children using propofol warrants more careful consideration, prioritizing safety. The authors acknowledge Prof. David W. Grainger (University of Utah, USA) for invaluable technical comments. None. - Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: N/A. - Informed consent: N/A. - Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A. - Animal studies: N/A.

DEN OpenVol. 5(1)
Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP), Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.