Post-operative breast imaging: a management dilemma. Can mammographic artificial intelligence help?

Abstract Background Imaging of the postoperative breast is a challenging issue for the interpreting physician with many variable findings that may require additional assessment through targeted ultrasound, more mammography views, or other investigations. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a fast-developing field with various applications in the breast imaging including the detection and classification of lesions, the prediction of therapy response, and the prediction of breast cancer risk. This study aimed to identify whether Artificial Intelligence improves the mammographic detection and diagnosis of breast post-operative changes and hence improves follow-up and diagnostic workflow and reduces the need for additional exposure to extra radiation or contrast material doses as in Contrast Enhanced Mammography, and the need for interventional procedures as biopsy. Methods This cross-sectional analytic study included 66 female patients following breast-conserving surgeries coming with breast complaints or for follow-up, with mammographically diagnosed changes. Results Mammography had a sensitivity of 91.7%, a specificity of 94.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.6%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%, and an accuracy of 93.9%, while the AI method indices were sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 92.6%, (PPV) 73.3%, (NPV) 98%, and accuracy 92.4%. The calculated cut-off point for the quantitative AI (probability of malignancy “POM” score) was 51.5%. There was a statistically significantly higher average in the percentage of POM in malignant cases (76.5 ± 27.3%) compared to benign cases (27.1 ± 19.7%). However, the final indices for the combined use of mammography and (AI) were sensitivity 100%, specificity 88.9%, (PPV) 66.7%, (NPV) 100%, and accuracy 90.9%. Conclusion Applying the AI algorithm on mammograms showed positive impacts on the sensitivity of the post-operative breast assessment, with an excellent reduction of the mammographic missed cancers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-024-01363-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-operative breast imaging: a management dilemma. Can mammographic artificial intelligence help?

Menna Allah Gaber Ahmed Mohamed Eissa, Lamia Adel Salaheldin, Omar Sherif Omar, Sarah Fathy Al-Tohamy
2 citations
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.81
article

Post-operative breast imaging: a management dilemma. Can mammographic artificial intelligence help?

Menna Allah Gaber Ahmed Mohamed Eissa, Lamia Adel Salaheldin, Omar Sherif Omar, Sarah Fathy Al-Tohamy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Imaging of the postoperative breast is a challenging issue for the interpreting physician with many variable findings that may require additional assessment through targeted ultrasound, more mammography views, or other investigations. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a fast-developing field with various applications in the breast imaging including the detection and classification of lesions, the prediction of therapy response, and the prediction of breast cancer risk. This study aimed to identify whether Artificial Intelligence improves the mammographic detection and diagnosis of breast post-operative changes and hence improves follow-up and diagnostic workflow and reduces the need for additional exposure to extra radiation or contrast material doses as in Contrast Enhanced Mammography, and the need for interventional procedures as biopsy. Methods This cross-sectional analytic study included 66 female patients following breast-conserving surgeries coming with breast complaints or for follow-up, with mammographically diagnosed changes. Results Mammography had a sensitivity of 91.7%, a specificity of 94.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.6%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%, and an accuracy of 93.9%, while the AI method indices were sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 92.6%, (PPV) 73.3%, (NPV) 98%, and accuracy 92.4%. The calculated cut-off point for the quantitative AI (probability of malignancy “POM” score) was 51.5%. There was a statistically significantly higher average in the percentage of POM in malignant cases (76.5 ± 27.3%) compared to benign cases (27.1 ± 19.7%). However, the final indices for the combined use of mammography and (AI) were sensitivity 100%, specificity 88.9%, (PPV) 66.7%, (NPV) 100%, and accuracy 90.9%. Conclusion Applying the AI algorithm on mammograms showed positive impacts on the sensitivity of the post-operative breast assessment, with an excellent reduction of the mammographic missed cancers.

The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineVol. 55(1)
Egyptian American Medical Center (EG), Cairo University hospitals (EG)
Cairo University
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.