Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study

Our survey suggests that ethics committee members generally support providing information to trial participants who stop taking part, if risks to participants are mitigated. We believe our guidance already addresses the main concerns raised. Our respondents' lack of prior experience with end-of-participation information sheets suggests that participants are not getting information they want or need when they stop participating. Our results help clarify how ethics committee should oversee post-consent participant communications, but further guidance from research regulators could be helpful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08465-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study

William J Cragg, Mary E. Mancini, Rachael Gilberts, Clara Martins de Barros et al.
1 citations
Trials
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study

William J Cragg, Mary E. Mancini, Rachael Gilberts, Clara Martins de Barros, Liam Bishop, Michael Gregg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our survey suggests that ethics committee members generally support providing information to trial participants who stop taking part, if risks to participants are mitigated. We believe our guidance already addresses the main concerns raised. Our respondents' lack of prior experience with end-of-participation information sheets suggests that participants are not getting information they want or need when they stop participating. Our results help clarify how ethics committee should oversee post-consent participant communications, but further guidance from research regulators could be helpful.

TrialsVol. 25(1)
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Trinity University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study — William J Cragg, Mary E. Mancini, et al. · Trials (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS