Impact of Metastatic Pattern on Survival in Patients with Posterior Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Metastatic posterior uveal melanoma (PUM) is one of the deadliest types of melanomas. Though the median survival is short, some patients with metastatic disease live for a long time. In this study, we investigated whether the anatomical location of the metastatic lesions is associated with differences in survival. <b>Methods</b>: One hundred and seventy-eight patients with metastatic PUM with baseline whole-body imaging were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into three groups based on the anatomical location of metastases: (1) exclusive liver metastases (hepatic pattern), (2) both hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (hepatic-extrahepatic pattern), and (3) exclusive extrahepatic lesions (extrahepatic pattern). Survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazard model. <b>Results</b>: In total, 95 patients (53%) presented with hepatic pattern, 66 patients (37%) presented with hepatic-extrahepatic pattern, and 17 patients (10%) presented with extrahepatic pattern. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients with extrahepatic pattern (median 17.0 months) compared to those with hepatic pattern (median 11.0 months) and hepatic-extrahepatic pattern (median 7.0 months) (<i>p</i> < 0.001, log-rank test). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed increased hazard ratios (HR) for hepatic pattern (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.08-5.17, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and hepatic-extrahepatic pattern (3.25, 95% CI 1.42-7.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005) compared to extrahepatic pattern. Most patients with hepatic (95%) and hepatic-extrahepatic patterns (82%) were diagnosed with metastases by liver ultrasonography screening, whereas 81% of patients with extrahepatic pattern developed symptoms that led to the diagnosis. <b>Conclusions</b>: Extrahepatic pattern was associated with prolonged survival in patients with metastatic PUM, despite there being a larger proportion of symptomatic patients. It is therefore important to consider the anatomical location of the metastatic lesions when stratifying patients into clinical trials.
Authors
- Steffen Heegaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-7670)
- Marco Donia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-9752)
- Eva Ellebæk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6748-9232)
- Steen F. Urbak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-4073)
- Eric von Benzon
- Camilla Wium Bjerrum
- Inge Marie Svane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-6037)
- Carsten Faber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-7270)
- Tine Gadegaard Hindsø (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-511X)
- Kristoffer Nissen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8007-8611)
- Jens Folke Kiilgaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460)
- Peter S. Jensen
- Mette B. Sjøl
- Karine Madsen
Institutions
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cancers
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193346
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.69