Clinical Evaluation of Nanohybrid Organically Modified Ceramic and Nanohybrid Conventional Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Proximal Compound Posterior Restorations: Randomized Clinical Study

Purpose: This study compared the clinical efficacy of nanohybrid organically modified ceramic (ORMOCER) bulk-fill resin composite vs nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite in proximal compound posterior restorations. Materials and methods: In this randomized controlled clinical study, a total of 30 proximal carious lesions were restored randomly with either the intervention nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite (Admira Fusion X-tra) or nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite (Grandioso X-tra). Two assessors who were blinded to the study procedures evaluated restorations at baseline (1 week), 6 months, and 12 months using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria, measuring functional, esthetic, and biological properties. Frequency and percentage represented the categorical data. Intragroup comparisons between interventions were calculated using the Chi-squared test. Results: The overall rate of survival of nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite and nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite for proximal restorations was evaluated after 1 year. No restorations failed after 12 months in biological, esthetic, and functional properties, with no statistically significant difference in intergroup or intragroup comparisons. However, the intergroup comparison between both materials showed a statistically significant difference in color match and translucency (<i>p</i> = 0.0003). Conclusion: Under the study limitations, it can be concluded that nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite showed comparable clinical efficacy to the nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite. Nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite demonstrated slightly superior esthetic results during the one-year follow-up. How to cite this article: Fahmy SH, El-Bialy MR, Safwat OM. Clinical Evaluation of Nanohybrid Organically Modified Ceramic and Nanohybrid Conventional Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Proximal Compound Posterior Restorations: Randomized Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):146–152.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1466
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Evaluation of Nanohybrid Organically Modified Ceramic and Nanohybrid Conventional Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Proximal Compound Posterior Restorations: Randomized Clinical Study

Omaima Mohamed Safwat, Mohamed Refaat ibrahim Elbialy, Safinaz H Fahmy
1 links
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Clinical Evaluation of Nanohybrid Organically Modified Ceramic and Nanohybrid Conventional Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Proximal Compound Posterior Restorations: Randomized Clinical Study

Omaima Mohamed Safwat, Mohamed Refaat ibrahim Elbialy, Safinaz H Fahmy
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the clinical efficacy of nanohybrid organically modified ceramic (ORMOCER) bulk-fill resin composite vs nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite in proximal compound posterior restorations. Materials and methods: In this randomized controlled clinical study, a total of 30 proximal carious lesions were restored randomly with either the intervention nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite (Admira Fusion X-tra) or nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite (Grandioso X-tra). Two assessors who were blinded to the study procedures evaluated restorations at baseline (1 week), 6 months, and 12 months using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria, measuring functional, esthetic, and biological properties. Frequency and percentage represented the categorical data. Intragroup comparisons between interventions were calculated using the Chi-squared test. Results: The overall rate of survival of nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite and nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite for proximal restorations was evaluated after 1 year. No restorations failed after 12 months in biological, esthetic, and functional properties, with no statistically significant difference in intergroup or intragroup comparisons. However, the intergroup comparison between both materials showed a statistically significant difference in color match and translucency (<i>p</i> = 0.0003). Conclusion: Under the study limitations, it can be concluded that nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite showed comparable clinical efficacy to the nanohybrid conventional bulk-fill resin composite. Nanohybrid ORMOCER bulk-fill resin composite demonstrated slightly superior esthetic results during the one-year follow-up. How to cite this article: Fahmy SH, El-Bialy MR, Safwat OM. Clinical Evaluation of Nanohybrid Organically Modified Ceramic and Nanohybrid Conventional Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Proximal Compound Posterior Restorations: Randomized Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):146–152.

International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.