Comparison of Retention of Clasps Fabricated with Cast Cobalt Chromium and Acetal Resin in Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study

Purpose: To compare the retention of clasps made from cast cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and acetal resin in maxillary obturator prostheses for Aramany class 1 and class 2 defects with two different undercut depths (0.010 and 0.015 inch) on anterior and molar abutment teeth before and after cyclic testing. Materials and methods: Maxillary obturator prostheses for Aramany class 1 and class 2 defects were fabricated with clasps of Co-Cr and acetal resin. The study comprised four groups: group A (Co-Cr clasps, class 1 defects), group B (Co-Cr clasps, class 2 defects), group C (acetal resin clasps, class 1 defects), and group D (acetal resin clasps, class 2 defects). Each group was subdivided based on undercut depth (0.010 and 0.015 inch). The obturator prostheses were tested for retention using pull-out tests before and after 1,095 mechanical stress cycles. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test. Results: For class 1 defects, cobalt-chromium clasps with 0.010 inch undercuts showed an initial retention force of 13.42 N (anterior) and 14.17 N (molar), which decreased postcycling. Clasps with a 0.015 inch undercut started with slightly higher retention, which also reduced after cycling. Acetal resin clasps, on the other hand, demonstrated lower initial retention values (e.g., 6.70 N and 7.25 N) and a significant drop postcycling. For class 2 defects, cobalt-chromium clasps performed similarly with higher initial forces than acetal resin, which again showed lower initial retention and greater reduction over time. Across both defect classes, cobalt-chromium clasps maintained superior retention compared to acetal resin. Conclusion: The study shows that both acetal resin and Co-Cr clasps provide good retention in maxillary obturator prostheses. Acetal resin is beneficial for esthetics and comfort, while Co-Cr offers superior strength and durability, making both materials valuable in different clinical scenarios. How to cite this article: Selvam D, Natarajan S, Seenivasan MK. Comparison of Retention of Clasps Fabricated with Cast Cobalt Chromium and Acetal Resin in Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):178–184.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1469
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Retention of Clasps Fabricated with Cast Cobalt Chromium and Acetal Resin in Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study

Madhan Kumar Seenivasan, Shanmuganathan Natarajan, Divyabharathi Selvam
1 links
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Comparison of Retention of Clasps Fabricated with Cast Cobalt Chromium and Acetal Resin in Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study

Madhan Kumar Seenivasan, Shanmuganathan Natarajan, Divyabharathi Selvam
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the retention of clasps made from cast cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and acetal resin in maxillary obturator prostheses for Aramany class 1 and class 2 defects with two different undercut depths (0.010 and 0.015 inch) on anterior and molar abutment teeth before and after cyclic testing. Materials and methods: Maxillary obturator prostheses for Aramany class 1 and class 2 defects were fabricated with clasps of Co-Cr and acetal resin. The study comprised four groups: group A (Co-Cr clasps, class 1 defects), group B (Co-Cr clasps, class 2 defects), group C (acetal resin clasps, class 1 defects), and group D (acetal resin clasps, class 2 defects). Each group was subdivided based on undercut depth (0.010 and 0.015 inch). The obturator prostheses were tested for retention using pull-out tests before and after 1,095 mechanical stress cycles. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test. Results: For class 1 defects, cobalt-chromium clasps with 0.010 inch undercuts showed an initial retention force of 13.42 N (anterior) and 14.17 N (molar), which decreased postcycling. Clasps with a 0.015 inch undercut started with slightly higher retention, which also reduced after cycling. Acetal resin clasps, on the other hand, demonstrated lower initial retention values (e.g., 6.70 N and 7.25 N) and a significant drop postcycling. For class 2 defects, cobalt-chromium clasps performed similarly with higher initial forces than acetal resin, which again showed lower initial retention and greater reduction over time. Across both defect classes, cobalt-chromium clasps maintained superior retention compared to acetal resin. Conclusion: The study shows that both acetal resin and Co-Cr clasps provide good retention in maxillary obturator prostheses. Acetal resin is beneficial for esthetics and comfort, while Co-Cr offers superior strength and durability, making both materials valuable in different clinical scenarios. How to cite this article: Selvam D, Natarajan S, Seenivasan MK. Comparison of Retention of Clasps Fabricated with Cast Cobalt Chromium and Acetal Resin in Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):178–184.

International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.