High levels of patient self advocacy may confound clinical research in understudied patient populations
To examine the levels of patient self-advocacy in a sample of participants with Chiari Malformation (CM) and to explore how they relate to clinical outcomes. As part of a larger clinical trial addressing chronic pain in patients with CM, 111 participants completed the Patient Self Advocacy Scale (PSAS), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). PSAS scores indicated a moderately high level of patient self-advocacy (Mean = 3.86 SD = 0.50). The PSAS was not related to depression, anxiety, stress, pain intensity, or pain interference. There were no differences in PSAS according to surgical status (<i>t</i>(61.25) = 0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.66) or use of pain medication (<i>t</i>(109) = 1.05, <i>p</i> = .29). Participants in a clinical trial for CM have high levels of pre-existing patient self-advocacy. Research is needed to understand how patient self-advocacy contributes to the management of CM and how it could impact research of individuals with understudied conditions.Clinical Trials Registration:NCT05581472.
Authors
- Douglas L. Delahanty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-7064)
- Philip A. Allen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-2217)
- Emily P. Rabinowitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1931-1824)
- Grant H. Ripley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6800-0922)
- Chase Lemek
Institutions
- University of Akron (US)
- Kent State University (US)
- Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241286643
- Primary Topic
- Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00