High levels of patient self advocacy may confound clinical research in understudied patient populations

To examine the levels of patient self-advocacy in a sample of participants with Chiari Malformation (CM) and to explore how they relate to clinical outcomes. As part of a larger clinical trial addressing chronic pain in patients with CM, 111 participants completed the Patient Self Advocacy Scale (PSAS), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). PSAS scores indicated a moderately high level of patient self-advocacy (Mean = 3.86 SD = 0.50). The PSAS was not related to depression, anxiety, stress, pain intensity, or pain interference. There were no differences in PSAS according to surgical status (<i>t</i>(61.25) = 0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.66) or use of pain medication (<i>t</i>(109) = 1.05, <i>p</i> = .29). Participants in a clinical trial for CM have high levels of pre-existing patient self-advocacy. Research is needed to understand how patient self-advocacy contributes to the management of CM and how it could impact research of individuals with understudied conditions.Clinical Trials Registration:NCT05581472.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241286643
Primary Topic
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High levels of patient self advocacy may confound clinical research in understudied patient populations

Douglas L. Delahanty, Philip A. Allen, Emily P. Rabinowitz, Grant H. Ripley et al.
Journal of Health Psychology
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
article

High levels of patient self advocacy may confound clinical research in understudied patient populations

Douglas L. Delahanty, Philip A. Allen, Emily P. Rabinowitz, Grant H. Ripley, Chase Lemek
article en

Abstract

To examine the levels of patient self-advocacy in a sample of participants with Chiari Malformation (CM) and to explore how they relate to clinical outcomes. As part of a larger clinical trial addressing chronic pain in patients with CM, 111 participants completed the Patient Self Advocacy Scale (PSAS), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). PSAS scores indicated a moderately high level of patient self-advocacy (Mean = 3.86 SD = 0.50). The PSAS was not related to depression, anxiety, stress, pain intensity, or pain interference. There were no differences in PSAS according to surgical status (<i>t</i>(61.25) = 0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.66) or use of pain medication (<i>t</i>(109) = 1.05, <i>p</i> = .29). Participants in a clinical trial for CM have high levels of pre-existing patient self-advocacy. Research is needed to understand how patient self-advocacy contributes to the management of CM and how it could impact research of individuals with understudied conditions.Clinical Trials Registration:NCT05581472.

Journal of Health PsychologyVol. 30(10)
University of Akron (US), Kent State University (US), Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.