Emulating the Delivery of Sawtooth Proton Arc Therapy Plans on a Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam Therapy System

<b>Purpose</b>: To evaluate and compare the deliverability of 'sawtooth' proton arc therapy (PAT) plans relative to static intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) at a cyclotron-based clinical facility. <b>Methods</b>: The delivery of single and dual arc Sawtooth PAT plans for an abdominal CT phantom and multiple clinical cases of brain, head and neck (H&N) and base of skull (BoS) targets was emulated under the step-and-shoot and continuous PAT delivery regimes and compared to that of a corresponding static IMPT plan. <b>Results</b>: Continuous PAT delivery increased the time associated with beam delivery and gantry movement in single/dual PAT plans by 4.86/7.34 min (brain), 7.51/12.40 min (BoS) and 6.59/10.57 min (H&N) on average relative to static IMPT. Step-and-shoot PAT increased this delivery time further by 4.79 min on average as the delivery was limited by gantry motion. <b>Conclusions</b>: The emulator can approximately model clinical sawtooth PAT delivery but requires experimental validation. No clear benefit was observed regarding beam-on time for sawtooth PAT relative to static IMPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193315
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emulating the Delivery of Sawtooth Proton Arc Therapy Plans on a Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam Therapy System

Adam H. Aitkenhead, Nicholas T. Henthorn, Ranald I. Mackay, Samuel Ingram et al.
Cancers
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Emulating the Delivery of Sawtooth Proton Arc Therapy Plans on a Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam Therapy System

Adam H. Aitkenhead, Nicholas T. Henthorn, Ranald I. Mackay, Samuel Ingram, Jack D. Aylward, Michael J. Merchant, Samuel Manger, John-William Warmenhoven, Robert Appleby, Peter Sitch, Samuel Burford-Eyre
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose</b>: To evaluate and compare the deliverability of 'sawtooth' proton arc therapy (PAT) plans relative to static intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) at a cyclotron-based clinical facility. <b>Methods</b>: The delivery of single and dual arc Sawtooth PAT plans for an abdominal CT phantom and multiple clinical cases of brain, head and neck (H&N) and base of skull (BoS) targets was emulated under the step-and-shoot and continuous PAT delivery regimes and compared to that of a corresponding static IMPT plan. <b>Results</b>: Continuous PAT delivery increased the time associated with beam delivery and gantry movement in single/dual PAT plans by 4.86/7.34 min (brain), 7.51/12.40 min (BoS) and 6.59/10.57 min (H&N) on average relative to static IMPT. Step-and-shoot PAT increased this delivery time further by 4.79 min on average as the delivery was limited by gantry motion. <b>Conclusions</b>: The emulator can approximately model clinical sawtooth PAT delivery but requires experimental validation. No clear benefit was observed regarding beam-on time for sawtooth PAT relative to static IMPT.

CancersVol. 16(19)
University of the West of England (GB), Cockcroft Institute (GB), University of Manchester (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Cancer Research UK, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.