Comparison between Medical and Mechanical Method (Foley's) of Termination of Pregnancy in second trimester in Previously Scarred Uterus

Background: Obstetricians are faced with the difficulty of ending pregnancies in women who have scars on their uteruses because to the global trend of an increased prevalence of cesarean sections. The present study compares mifepristone against Foley's catheter for termination in uteri with prior scarring which will help the obstetricians in deciding which procedure has less complications and better efficacy that will enhance the quality of life of women having second trimester abortions. Aim & Objectives: To assess the safety and effectiveness of using mifepristone versus Foleys bulb for termination of pregnancy in previous LSCS and hysterotomy and compare the efficacy of medical versus mechanical induction and potential risks or adverse effects. Material and Methods: 40 pregnant women with the gestational age of 12 - 28 weeks participated in this hospital - based observational research which lasted for 12 months at Muzaffarnagar Medical College & Hospital in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. Chi square and t test were used in the statistical analysis of the data. Results: The participants ranged in age from 20 - 35 years old. Both Group M and Group B comprised the highest percentage of patients in age group 26 - 30 years i.e. 55% and 50% respectively. Mean induction to interval of labour (in hrs), induction to augmentation interval, and induction to interval of delivery (in hrs) was more in Group B than the mifepristone group (Group M) (p < 0.05). In Mifepristone group, maximum reported complication was fever i.e. 4 cases experienced fever while in Foleys Bulb group, 7 cases had need for instrumentation (suction and evacuation). Conclusion: Mean induction to labour interval (in hrs), induction augmentation interval, and induction to delivery interval (in hrs) was more in Foleys bulb group (Group B) than the mifepristone group (Group M), being statistically significant. So, we conclude that mifepristone can be a better method for termination of pregnancy in scarred uterus as compared to Foley's catheter.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/sr24924095704
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Medical and Mechanical Method (Foley's) of Termination of Pregnancy in second trimester in Previously Scarred Uterus

Poonam Mani, x Vidushi
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Comparison between Medical and Mechanical Method (Foley's) of Termination of Pregnancy in second trimester in Previously Scarred Uterus

Poonam Mani, x Vidushi
article en

Abstract

Background: Obstetricians are faced with the difficulty of ending pregnancies in women who have scars on their uteruses because to the global trend of an increased prevalence of cesarean sections. The present study compares mifepristone against Foley's catheter for termination in uteri with prior scarring which will help the obstetricians in deciding which procedure has less complications and better efficacy that will enhance the quality of life of women having second trimester abortions. Aim & Objectives: To assess the safety and effectiveness of using mifepristone versus Foleys bulb for termination of pregnancy in previous LSCS and hysterotomy and compare the efficacy of medical versus mechanical induction and potential risks or adverse effects. Material and Methods: 40 pregnant women with the gestational age of 12 - 28 weeks participated in this hospital - based observational research which lasted for 12 months at Muzaffarnagar Medical College & Hospital in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. Chi square and t test were used in the statistical analysis of the data. Results: The participants ranged in age from 20 - 35 years old. Both Group M and Group B comprised the highest percentage of patients in age group 26 - 30 years i.e. 55% and 50% respectively. Mean induction to interval of labour (in hrs), induction to augmentation interval, and induction to interval of delivery (in hrs) was more in Group B than the mifepristone group (Group M) (p < 0.05). In Mifepristone group, maximum reported complication was fever i.e. 4 cases experienced fever while in Foleys Bulb group, 7 cases had need for instrumentation (suction and evacuation). Conclusion: Mean induction to labour interval (in hrs), induction augmentation interval, and induction to delivery interval (in hrs) was more in Foleys bulb group (Group B) than the mifepristone group (Group M), being statistically significant. So, we conclude that mifepristone can be a better method for termination of pregnancy in scarred uterus as compared to Foley's catheter.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 13(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison between Medical and Mechanical Method (Foley's) of Termination of Pregnancy in second trimester in Previously Scarred Uterus — Poonam Mani, x Vidushi · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS