Evaluation of the Effect of Impregnation Methods on Flexural Strength of Polypropylene Fibers Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Material: An In Vitro Study

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of impregnation procedures on the flexural strength of polypropylene fibers reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base material. Materials and methods: Eighty PMMA samples of dimensions 65 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm were fabricated after different treatments as control group C (<i>n</i> = 20) and three test groups: silanized polypropylene fibers T<sub>1</sub> (<i>n</i> = 20) (fibers treated with silane coupling agent), polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer T<sub>2</sub> (<i>n</i> = 20) (fibers treated with monomer), and silanized polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer T<sub>3</sub> (<i>n</i> = 20) (fibers treated with silane coupling agent and monomer). Samples were subjected to flexural loading using a universal testing machine. Flexural strength was evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple analysis was done by Mann–Whitney <i>post hoc</i> analysis tests. Results: Mean flexural strength values obtained from different groups demonstrate that test group T<sub>3</sub> (silanized polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer) exhibits higher flexural strength (0.325 ± 0.021 N/mm²) followed by test group T<sub>2</sub> (polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer, 0.221 ± 0.009 N/mm²) and control group C (0.141 ± 0.011 N/mm²). Test group T<sub>1</sub> (silanized polypropylene fibers) showed the lowest mean flexural strength (0.070 ± 0.008 N/mm²)among all the study groups and the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mann–Whitney <i>post hoc</i> analysis showed that there was a significant difference between all groups. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, silanized polypropylene fibers showed the lowest mean flexural strength. When silanized polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer their flexural strength increased. In instances of anticipated fracture of dentures, impregnation procedures and addition of polypropylene fibers would be help to minimize them. How to cite this article: Chavadapu K, Duggineni CR, Chitturi RK, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of the Effect of Impregnation Methods on Flexural Strength of Polypropylene Fibers Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Material: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):165–169.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1464
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Effect of Impregnation Methods on Flexural Strength of Polypropylene Fibers Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Material: An In Vitro Study

Harilal Guguloth, Kavitha Chavadapu, Ravi Kumar Chitturi, Priyanka Golla et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
0.40
article

Evaluation of the Effect of Impregnation Methods on Flexural Strength of Polypropylene Fibers Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Material: An In Vitro Study

Harilal Guguloth, Kavitha Chavadapu, Ravi Kumar Chitturi, Priyanka Golla, Sravanthi Khatravath, Chalapathi Rao Duggineni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of impregnation procedures on the flexural strength of polypropylene fibers reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base material. Materials and methods: Eighty PMMA samples of dimensions 65 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm were fabricated after different treatments as control group C (<i>n</i> = 20) and three test groups: silanized polypropylene fibers T<sub>1</sub> (<i>n</i> = 20) (fibers treated with silane coupling agent), polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer T<sub>2</sub> (<i>n</i> = 20) (fibers treated with monomer), and silanized polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer T<sub>3</sub> (<i>n</i> = 20) (fibers treated with silane coupling agent and monomer). Samples were subjected to flexural loading using a universal testing machine. Flexural strength was evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple analysis was done by Mann–Whitney <i>post hoc</i> analysis tests. Results: Mean flexural strength values obtained from different groups demonstrate that test group T<sub>3</sub> (silanized polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer) exhibits higher flexural strength (0.325 ± 0.021 N/mm²) followed by test group T<sub>2</sub> (polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer, 0.221 ± 0.009 N/mm²) and control group C (0.141 ± 0.011 N/mm²). Test group T<sub>1</sub> (silanized polypropylene fibers) showed the lowest mean flexural strength (0.070 ± 0.008 N/mm²)among all the study groups and the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mann–Whitney <i>post hoc</i> analysis showed that there was a significant difference between all groups. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, silanized polypropylene fibers showed the lowest mean flexural strength. When silanized polypropylene fibers soaked in monomer their flexural strength increased. In instances of anticipated fracture of dentures, impregnation procedures and addition of polypropylene fibers would be help to minimize them. How to cite this article: Chavadapu K, Duggineni CR, Chitturi RK, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of the Effect of Impregnation Methods on Flexural Strength of Polypropylene Fibers Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Material: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):165–169.

International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Dental materials and restorations
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.