Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Purpose: Comparative assessment of the adhesive bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC to human dentin. Materials and methods: Forty-five human permanent molars were embedded in acrylic resin block. GIC was modified with 25% ethanol-soluble liquid propolis (ESLP) solution and 50% ESLP to prepare 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC, respectively. The enamel was removed to expose the dentin followed by conditioning of the dentin surfaces. The samples were randomly divided into three groups: conventional GIC (group A), 25% propolis-modified GIC (group B), and 50% propolis-modified GIC (group C). Standardized-size molds were applied to the exposed dentin, and the GIC was bonded within these molds to form GIC cylinders. Shear bond strength was evaluated after incubation and thermocycling to simulate the oral environment using a universal testing machine. The statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <i>post hoc</i> Tukey’s test. Results: There was significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.001) in adhesive bond strength among different groups. The highest mean adhesive bond strength (2.287 ± 0.372 MPa) was noticed in group B (25% propolis-modified GIC), followed by group A (conventional GIC 2.200 ± 0.853 MPa), and then group C (50% propolis-modified GIC 2.200 ± 0.853 MPa. There was statistically significant difference between conventional GIC and 25% propolis-modified GIC (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusion: 25% propolis-modified GIC showed the most significant improvement in bond strength of conventional GIC. 50% propolis-modified GIC showed a deleterious effect. The 25% propolis-modified GIC seems to have the potential to improve clinical performance of restoration. How to cite this article: Madhamshetty N, Punia SK, Bhargava R, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):140–145.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1468
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Shilpi Kushwaha, Rahul Bhargava, Namitha Madhamshetty, Yogender Chaudhary et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
0.80
article

Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Shilpi Kushwaha, Rahul Bhargava, Namitha Madhamshetty, Yogender Chaudhary, Sandhya Kapoor Punia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Comparative assessment of the adhesive bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC to human dentin. Materials and methods: Forty-five human permanent molars were embedded in acrylic resin block. GIC was modified with 25% ethanol-soluble liquid propolis (ESLP) solution and 50% ESLP to prepare 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC, respectively. The enamel was removed to expose the dentin followed by conditioning of the dentin surfaces. The samples were randomly divided into three groups: conventional GIC (group A), 25% propolis-modified GIC (group B), and 50% propolis-modified GIC (group C). Standardized-size molds were applied to the exposed dentin, and the GIC was bonded within these molds to form GIC cylinders. Shear bond strength was evaluated after incubation and thermocycling to simulate the oral environment using a universal testing machine. The statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <i>post hoc</i> Tukey’s test. Results: There was significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.001) in adhesive bond strength among different groups. The highest mean adhesive bond strength (2.287 ± 0.372 MPa) was noticed in group B (25% propolis-modified GIC), followed by group A (conventional GIC 2.200 ± 0.853 MPa), and then group C (50% propolis-modified GIC 2.200 ± 0.853 MPa. There was statistically significant difference between conventional GIC and 25% propolis-modified GIC (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusion: 25% propolis-modified GIC showed the most significant improvement in bond strength of conventional GIC. 50% propolis-modified GIC showed a deleterious effect. The 25% propolis-modified GIC seems to have the potential to improve clinical performance of restoration. How to cite this article: Madhamshetty N, Punia SK, Bhargava R, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(3):140–145.

International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Dental materials and restorations
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.