2938 Diagnosing brain tumours in children’s ED – are we getting it right? A retrospective cohort study of investigation pathways at a tertiary centre

<h3>Aims and Objectives</h3> Brain tumours are the commonest paediatric solid tumour [1]. Presenting symptoms are often non-specific, posing diagnostic challenges in the Children’s Emergency Department (CED). We aimed to establish practice at a tertiary CED regarding radiological investigation for children with suspected malignant space occupying lesions (SOL), and assess whether practice may under- or over-investigate paediatric presentations.(2)(3). <h3>Method and Design</h3> A retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-15 undergoing CT imaging in CED for suspected SOLs between April 2022-2024. Demographic, clinical and diagnostic data were collected and assessed against ‘HeadSmart’ imaging recommendations SOL detection. Scans focussed on other pathologies (abscesses/trauma/shunts or existing pathologies) were excluded. <h3>Results and Conclusion</h3> 304 patients were included. In patients ≤4yrs (n=95), 92% of scans were ordered in line with HeadSmart criteria. One SOL was reported (NNT = 95). In the &gt;5yr group (n=209), 83% of scans were requested in line with guidelines. &gt;50% of scans were prompted by headaches. Of those not meeting imaging criteria (n=35), 92% had symptoms of insufficient duration. Four neoplastic SOLs were diagnosed (NNT=52). All confirmed new SOL diagnoses met imaging criteria. 26.6% (n=81) of patients subsequently underwent an MRI. In those with a normal CT head (n=58), the pick-up of benign findings was 15.5% (n=9), with no additional SOLs identified. Whilst most CT heads for suspected SOL were ordered appropriately, there were numerous &gt;5yrs who did not meet national criteria. However, there may be an opportunity for non-radiological reassurance (clinical evaluation, observations and fundoscopy) with careful safety-netting and timely follow-up in these selected patients. MRI imaging did not increase SOL discovery following normal CT and may be unnecessary unless significant concerns remain. Whilst national guidelines support effective SOL detection in CED, a balance needs to be struck to limit unnecessary radiation and MRI use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-rcem.31
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2938 Diagnosing brain tumours in children’s ED – are we getting it right? A retrospective cohort study of investigation pathways at a tertiary centre

Michael Malley, Sophie Blummers, Lisa Or, L. Reed et al.
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

2938 Diagnosing brain tumours in children’s ED – are we getting it right? A retrospective cohort study of investigation pathways at a tertiary centre

Michael Malley, Sophie Blummers, Lisa Or, L. Reed, A. C. H. Cairns, Millie Richardson
article en

Abstract

<h3>Aims and Objectives</h3> Brain tumours are the commonest paediatric solid tumour [1]. Presenting symptoms are often non-specific, posing diagnostic challenges in the Children’s Emergency Department (CED). We aimed to establish practice at a tertiary CED regarding radiological investigation for children with suspected malignant space occupying lesions (SOL), and assess whether practice may under- or over-investigate paediatric presentations.(2)(3). <h3>Method and Design</h3> A retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-15 undergoing CT imaging in CED for suspected SOLs between April 2022-2024. Demographic, clinical and diagnostic data were collected and assessed against ‘HeadSmart’ imaging recommendations SOL detection. Scans focussed on other pathologies (abscesses/trauma/shunts or existing pathologies) were excluded. <h3>Results and Conclusion</h3> 304 patients were included. In patients ≤4yrs (n=95), 92% of scans were ordered in line with HeadSmart criteria. One SOL was reported (NNT = 95). In the &gt;5yr group (n=209), 83% of scans were requested in line with guidelines. &gt;50% of scans were prompted by headaches. Of those not meeting imaging criteria (n=35), 92% had symptoms of insufficient duration. Four neoplastic SOLs were diagnosed (NNT=52). All confirmed new SOL diagnoses met imaging criteria. 26.6% (n=81) of patients subsequently underwent an MRI. In those with a normal CT head (n=58), the pick-up of benign findings was 15.5% (n=9), with no additional SOLs identified. Whilst most CT heads for suspected SOL were ordered appropriately, there were numerous &gt;5yrs who did not meet national criteria. However, there may be an opportunity for non-radiological reassurance (clinical evaluation, observations and fundoscopy) with careful safety-netting and timely follow-up in these selected patients. MRI imaging did not increase SOL discovery following normal CT and may be unnecessary unless significant concerns remain. Whilst national guidelines support effective SOL detection in CED, a balance needs to be struck to limit unnecessary radiation and MRI use.

Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.