Differences in the Reaction Mechanisms of Chlorine Atom and Hydroxyl Radical with Organic Compounds: From Thermodynamics to Kinetics

Hydroxyl radical (HO<sup>•</sup>) and chlorine atom (Cl<sup>•</sup>) are common reactive species in aqueous environments. However, the intrinsic difference in their reactions with organic compounds has not been revealed. This study compared the reaction mechanisms of HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup> with 13 aromatic and 11 aliphatic compounds by quantum chemical calculation and laser flash photolysis. Both HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup> can spontaneously react with aromatic compounds via radical adduct formation (RAF), hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), and single electron transfer (SET) pathways. The SET reactions of Cl<sup>•</sup> were more thermodynamically favorable than HO<sup>•</sup>, but contrary results were obtained for HAT reactions. According to the free energy of activation (Δ<i>G</i><sub>aq</sub><sup>‡</sup>), the dominant oxidation mechanisms of aromatic compounds were RAF and SET by HO<sup>•</sup> and SET by Cl<sup>•</sup>. The important role of SET in the HO<sup>•</sup> reactions with aromatic compounds was further verified by accurately calculating the solvation free energy of HO<sup>•</sup>/HO<sup>-</sup> and experimentally tracking the radical cations, which were generally neglected in previous studies. Meanwhile, the Δ<i>G</i><sub>aq</sub><sup>‡</sup> value of each reaction pathway of Cl<sup>•</sup> was lower than that of HO<sup>•</sup>, resulting in higher rate constants of Cl<sup>•</sup> with aromatic compounds than HO<sup>•</sup>. For saturated aliphatic compounds, HAT was found to be the only mechanism accounting for their transformation by HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup>. This study proposed general rules for the reaction mechanisms of HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup> and unraveled their differences in the aspects of thermodynamics and kinetics, providing fundamental information for understanding contaminant transformation in processes involving HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c03872
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in the Reaction Mechanisms of Chlorine Atom and Hydroxyl Radical with Organic Compounds: From Thermodynamics to Kinetics

Chunyan Chen, Kaiheng Guo, Wenlei Qin, Jingyun Fang
19 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
7.15
article

Differences in the Reaction Mechanisms of Chlorine Atom and Hydroxyl Radical with Organic Compounds: From Thermodynamics to Kinetics

Chunyan Chen, Kaiheng Guo, Wenlei Qin, Jingyun Fang
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Hydroxyl radical (HO<sup>•</sup>) and chlorine atom (Cl<sup>•</sup>) are common reactive species in aqueous environments. However, the intrinsic difference in their reactions with organic compounds has not been revealed. This study compared the reaction mechanisms of HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup> with 13 aromatic and 11 aliphatic compounds by quantum chemical calculation and laser flash photolysis. Both HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup> can spontaneously react with aromatic compounds via radical adduct formation (RAF), hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), and single electron transfer (SET) pathways. The SET reactions of Cl<sup>•</sup> were more thermodynamically favorable than HO<sup>•</sup>, but contrary results were obtained for HAT reactions. According to the free energy of activation (Δ<i>G</i><sub>aq</sub><sup>‡</sup>), the dominant oxidation mechanisms of aromatic compounds were RAF and SET by HO<sup>•</sup> and SET by Cl<sup>•</sup>. The important role of SET in the HO<sup>•</sup> reactions with aromatic compounds was further verified by accurately calculating the solvation free energy of HO<sup>•</sup>/HO<sup>-</sup> and experimentally tracking the radical cations, which were generally neglected in previous studies. Meanwhile, the Δ<i>G</i><sub>aq</sub><sup>‡</sup> value of each reaction pathway of Cl<sup>•</sup> was lower than that of HO<sup>•</sup>, resulting in higher rate constants of Cl<sup>•</sup> with aromatic compounds than HO<sup>•</sup>. For saturated aliphatic compounds, HAT was found to be the only mechanism accounting for their transformation by HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup>. This study proposed general rules for the reaction mechanisms of HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup> and unraveled their differences in the aspects of thermodynamics and kinetics, providing fundamental information for understanding contaminant transformation in processes involving HO<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sup>•</sup>.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 58(40)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
7.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.