USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING AND FEATURE SELECTION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LOW BACK PAIN

Aim:A wide variety of research is currently being conducted on how artificial intelligence can assist clinical decision-making and improve clinician judgments. The goal of this research was to develop a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) approach that can aid healthcare professionals in identifying lumbosacral pathologies. Material and Methods:The study included 633 abnormal and 442 normal lateral lumbosacral radiographs, and the You Only Look Once algorithm was used to automate the cropping task. This study used pre-trained VGG-16, ResNet-101, and MobileNetV2 models for transfer learning. Feature extraction was performed from the intermediate layer of VGG-16, resulting in 512 features. Then, a variance threshold was applied, resulting in 221 selected features with a variance threshold of 0.01. Then, support vector classifier, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and k-nearest neighbours machine learning models were trained using both sets of 512 extracted features and 221 selected features separately. Results:The results from the ensemble learning model with the stacking classifier using features selected using a threshold value 0.01 from features extracted were: accuracy 93.0% (best); sensitivity, 91.8%; specificity, 94.1%; precision, 92.9%; F1 score, 92.3% (best); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.97 (one of the best); and Cohen's kappa, 0.86 (best). Conclusion:The ensemble learning model with a stacking classifier using features selected by using a threshold value of 0.01 from features extracted by processing the intermediate layer of VGG-16 performs better than the transfer learning models using pre-trained networks, such as VGG-16, ResNet-50, and MobileNetV2, and the learning methods that do not apply feature selection in distinguishing lumbar vertebral pathologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Rheumatology Quarterly
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/qrheumatol.galenos.2024.85057
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING AND FEATURE SELECTION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LOW BACK PAIN

Hadi Hakan Maraş, Kemal Üreten, Yüksel Maraş, Semra Duran et al.
Rheumatology Quarterly
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING AND FEATURE SELECTION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LOW BACK PAIN

Hadi Hakan Maraş, Kemal Üreten, Yüksel Maraş, Semra Duran, Ahmet Kor, Ebru Atalar, Kevser Orhan, Emine Sena Sözen
article en

Abstract

Aim:A wide variety of research is currently being conducted on how artificial intelligence can assist clinical decision-making and improve clinician judgments. The goal of this research was to develop a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) approach that can aid healthcare professionals in identifying lumbosacral pathologies. Material and Methods:The study included 633 abnormal and 442 normal lateral lumbosacral radiographs, and the You Only Look Once algorithm was used to automate the cropping task. This study used pre-trained VGG-16, ResNet-101, and MobileNetV2 models for transfer learning. Feature extraction was performed from the intermediate layer of VGG-16, resulting in 512 features. Then, a variance threshold was applied, resulting in 221 selected features with a variance threshold of 0.01. Then, support vector classifier, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and k-nearest neighbours machine learning models were trained using both sets of 512 extracted features and 221 selected features separately. Results:The results from the ensemble learning model with the stacking classifier using features selected using a threshold value 0.01 from features extracted were: accuracy 93.0% (best); sensitivity, 91.8%; specificity, 94.1%; precision, 92.9%; F1 score, 92.3% (best); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.97 (one of the best); and Cohen's kappa, 0.86 (best). Conclusion:The ensemble learning model with a stacking classifier using features selected by using a threshold value of 0.01 from features extracted by processing the intermediate layer of VGG-16 performs better than the transfer learning models using pre-trained networks, such as VGG-16, ResNet-50, and MobileNetV2, and the learning methods that do not apply feature selection in distinguishing lumbar vertebral pathologies.

Rheumatology QuarterlyVol. 2(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.