Gender Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Artificial Intelligence When Representing Cardiologists
Introduction: While the global medical graduate and student population is approximately 50% female, only 13–15% of cardiologists and 20–27% of training fellows in cardiology are female. The potentially transformative use of text-to-image generative artificial intelligence (AI) could improve promotions and professional perceptions. In particular, DALL-E 3 offers a useful tool for promotion and education, but it could reinforce gender and ethnicity biases. Method: Responding to pre-specified prompts, DALL-E 3 via GPT-4 generated a series of individual and group images of cardiologists. Overall, 44 images were produced, including 32 images that contained individual characters and 12 group images that contained between 7 and 17 characters. All images were independently analysed by three reviewers for the characters’ apparent genders, ages, and skin tones. Results: Among all images combined, 86% (N = 123) of cardiologists were depicted as male. A light skin tone was observed in 93% (N = 133) of cardiologists. The gender distribution was not statistically different from that of actual Australian workforce data (p = 0.7342), but this represents a DALL-E 3 gender bias and the under-representation of females in the cardiology workforce. Conclusions: Gender bias associated with text-to-image generative AI when using DALL-E 3 among cardiologists limits its usefulness for promotion and education in addressing the workforce gender disparities.
Authors
- Hosen Kiat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2899-118X)
- Geoffrey Michael Currie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-8586)
- Christina Chandra
Institutions
- Australian National University (AU)
- Charles Sturt University (AU)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Information
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100594
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.96