Students as citizen scientists on social media: how do learners evaluate science communication on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube?

As part of the Citizen Science Awards in Austria, the project “We Talk About Science” explored how students interact with and assess science communication on Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok. Over three months in 2023, 21 school classes recorded 3,654 instances of science communication content. The study found significant differences in students’ abilities to critically evaluate this content, influenced by platform type and gender. Instagram posts received lower evaluations, and boys rated posts on Instagram and TikTok more negatively than girls. These findings highlight the need for educational initiatives to improve students’ critical analysis of science communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARPHA proceedings
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.e126587
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile Learning in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students as citizen scientists on social media: how do learners evaluate science communication on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube?

Philipp Spitzer
1 citations
ARPHA proceedings
Mobile Learning in Education
0.78
article

Students as citizen scientists on social media: how do learners evaluate science communication on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube?

Philipp Spitzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As part of the Citizen Science Awards in Austria, the project “We Talk About Science” explored how students interact with and assess science communication on Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok. Over three months in 2023, 21 school classes recorded 3,654 instances of science communication content. The study found significant differences in students’ abilities to critically evaluate this content, influenced by platform type and gender. Instagram posts received lower evaluations, and boys rated posts on Instagram and TikTok more negatively than girls. These findings highlight the need for educational initiatives to improve students’ critical analysis of science communication.

ARPHA proceedingsVol. 1
University of Graz (AT)
Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mobile Learning in Education
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.