Cytotoxicity and Epithelial Barrier Toxicity of Fine Particles from Residential Biomass Pellet Burning

Rising environmental concerns associated with the domestic use of solid biofuels have driven the search for clean energy alternatives. This study investigated the <i>in vitro</i> toxicological characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from residential biomass pellet burning using the A549 epithelial cell line. The potential of modern pellet applications to reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions was evaluated by considering both mass reduction and toxicity modification. PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from raw and pelletized biomass combustion reduced cell viability, indicative of acute toxicity, and also protein expression associated with epithelial barrier integrity, implying further systemic toxicity, potentially via an oxidative stress mechanism. Toxicity varied between PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from raw biomass and pellets, with pelletized straw and wood inducing cytotoxicity by factors of 0.54 and 1.30, and causing epithelial barrier damage by factors of 1.76 and 2.08, respectively, compared to their raw counterparts. Factoring in both mass reduction and toxicity modifications, PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from pelletized straw and wood dropped to 1.83 and 5.07 g/kg, respectively, from 30.1 to 9.32 g/kg for raw biomass combustion. This study underscores the effectiveness of pelletized biomass, particularly straw pellets, as a sustainable alternative to traditional biofuels and highlights the necessity of considering changes in toxicity when assessing the potential of clean fuels to mitigate emissions of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> complex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04687
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cytotoxicity and Epithelial Barrier Toxicity of Fine Particles from Residential Biomass Pellet Burning

Yucai Chen, Yue Wu, Xinlei Liu, Guofeng Shen et al.
7 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.93
article

Cytotoxicity and Epithelial Barrier Toxicity of Fine Particles from Residential Biomass Pellet Burning

Yucai Chen, Yue Wu, Xinlei Liu, Guofeng Shen, Shu Min Tao, Sijin Liu, Yaojie Li, Yu Qi, Lu Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Zhihan Luo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Rising environmental concerns associated with the domestic use of solid biofuels have driven the search for clean energy alternatives. This study investigated the <i>in vitro</i> toxicological characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from residential biomass pellet burning using the A549 epithelial cell line. The potential of modern pellet applications to reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions was evaluated by considering both mass reduction and toxicity modification. PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from raw and pelletized biomass combustion reduced cell viability, indicative of acute toxicity, and also protein expression associated with epithelial barrier integrity, implying further systemic toxicity, potentially via an oxidative stress mechanism. Toxicity varied between PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from raw biomass and pellets, with pelletized straw and wood inducing cytotoxicity by factors of 0.54 and 1.30, and causing epithelial barrier damage by factors of 1.76 and 2.08, respectively, compared to their raw counterparts. Factoring in both mass reduction and toxicity modifications, PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from pelletized straw and wood dropped to 1.83 and 5.07 g/kg, respectively, from 30.1 to 9.32 g/kg for raw biomass combustion. This study underscores the effectiveness of pelletized biomass, particularly straw pellets, as a sustainable alternative to traditional biofuels and highlights the necessity of considering changes in toxicity when assessing the potential of clean fuels to mitigate emissions of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> complex.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 58(40)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Peking University, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.