Effects of loneliness on healthcare utilization and medical expenditures in US cancer survivors.

368 Background: Loneliness is associated with increased mortality risk in cancer survivors. However, effects of loneliness on healthcare utilization are understudied. This study examined associations of loneliness with having emergency room (ER) visit, usual source of care, and hospitalization in US adults with and without cancer history. Methods: We identified 1,844 cancer survivors and 9,517 adults without a cancer history from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Loneliness was measured by 3 questions on feeling lack of companionship, left out, and isolated from others. Scores for each question were summed to create a total loneliness score, which was categorized into low/no loneliness (3-5) and high loneliness (6-9) based on previous literature. Separate logistic regression models were used to assess association of loneliness and whether having ER visit, usual source of care, and hospitalization. All models adjusted for age, region, sex, race, non-cancer health conditions, activity limitation, marital status, education, health insurance, and cancer diagnosis. We used a cancer history by loneliness interaction term to examine the differential associations of loneliness and healthcare utilization by cancer history. Results: 2,367 (23%) adults without a cancer history and 450 (22%) cancer survivors reported loneliness. All adults averagely aged over 50, with more female (non-cancer: 57.1 vs 49.9%, cancer: 68.0 vs 55.9%) and those with non-cancer health conditions ≥3 (non-cancer: 20.6 vs 15.4%, cancer: 54.0 vs 44.4%) in the loneliness group. Cancer history modified the association between loneliness and ER visit (interaction term p-value 0.04), but didn’t modify the association with having usual source of care (p=0.38) or hospitalization (p=0.87). Loneliness was associated with having ER visit (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.00) in cancer survivors while not in non-cancer patients (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92-1.27). No significant association was observed between loneliness and having usual source of care or hospitalization. Conclusions: Loneliness is associated with ER visit in US cancer survivors. Findings warrant further study of impact of loneliness on clinical outcomes in cancer survivors, with the aim of enhancing strategies to mitigate loneliness and optimize healthcare utilization. Association of loneliness and healthcare utilization. No Cancer History (9,517, 85%) Cancer History (1,844, 15%) Loneliness No (7,150, 77%) Yes (2,367, 23%) No (1,394, 78%) Yes (450, 22%) Odds ratio Having ER visit Ref 1.08 (0.92-1.27) Ref 1.49 (1.11-2.00) Having usual source of care 1.08 (0.89-1.30) 0.90 (0.62-1.30) Having hospitalization 0.93 (0.79-1.09) 0.96 (0.62-1.48)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.368
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of loneliness on healthcare utilization and medical expenditures in US cancer survivors.

Ryan David Nipp, K. Robin Yabroff, Jingxuan Zhao, Changchuan Jiang et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Effects of loneliness on healthcare utilization and medical expenditures in US cancer survivors.

Ryan David Nipp, K. Robin Yabroff, Jingxuan Zhao, Changchuan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zheng, Fangyuan Chen, Xuesong Han
article en

Abstract

368 Background: Loneliness is associated with increased mortality risk in cancer survivors. However, effects of loneliness on healthcare utilization are understudied. This study examined associations of loneliness with having emergency room (ER) visit, usual source of care, and hospitalization in US adults with and without cancer history. Methods: We identified 1,844 cancer survivors and 9,517 adults without a cancer history from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Loneliness was measured by 3 questions on feeling lack of companionship, left out, and isolated from others. Scores for each question were summed to create a total loneliness score, which was categorized into low/no loneliness (3-5) and high loneliness (6-9) based on previous literature. Separate logistic regression models were used to assess association of loneliness and whether having ER visit, usual source of care, and hospitalization. All models adjusted for age, region, sex, race, non-cancer health conditions, activity limitation, marital status, education, health insurance, and cancer diagnosis. We used a cancer history by loneliness interaction term to examine the differential associations of loneliness and healthcare utilization by cancer history. Results: 2,367 (23%) adults without a cancer history and 450 (22%) cancer survivors reported loneliness. All adults averagely aged over 50, with more female (non-cancer: 57.1 vs 49.9%, cancer: 68.0 vs 55.9%) and those with non-cancer health conditions ≥3 (non-cancer: 20.6 vs 15.4%, cancer: 54.0 vs 44.4%) in the loneliness group. Cancer history modified the association between loneliness and ER visit (interaction term p-value 0.04), but didn’t modify the association with having usual source of care (p=0.38) or hospitalization (p=0.87). Loneliness was associated with having ER visit (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.00) in cancer survivors while not in non-cancer patients (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92-1.27). No significant association was observed between loneliness and having usual source of care or hospitalization. Conclusions: Loneliness is associated with ER visit in US cancer survivors. Findings warrant further study of impact of loneliness on clinical outcomes in cancer survivors, with the aim of enhancing strategies to mitigate loneliness and optimize healthcare utilization. Association of loneliness and healthcare utilization. No Cancer History (9,517, 85%) Cancer History (1,844, 15%) Loneliness No (7,150, 77%) Yes (2,367, 23%) No (1,394, 78%) Yes (450, 22%) Odds ratio Having ER visit Ref 1.08 (0.92-1.27) Ref 1.49 (1.11-2.00) Having usual source of care 1.08 (0.89-1.30) 0.90 (0.62-1.30) Having hospitalization 0.93 (0.79-1.09) 0.96 (0.62-1.48)

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
American Cancer Society (US), Oklahoma City University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Oklahoma (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.