Development of a tool to assess financial advocacy service delivery.

21 Background: In 2023, the Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) Financial Advocacy Network published Financial Advocacy Services Guidelines developed through an expert-led, consensus-driven process (1). The Guidelines provide a framework for equitable delivery of financial advocacy (FA) services to address patients’ financial concerns. The Guidelines cover 3 domains: financial advocacy services and functions, program management functions, and partner engagement functions. ACCC adapted the Guidelines into a Financial Advocacy Services Assessment Tool to help cancer care organizations assess and improve service delivery and to advance research of organization-level FA practices across the U.S. Methods: ACCC convened an expert task force to guide this work. ACCC conducted a scan of implementation science literature and health care organizational assessments to inform the development of a rating system for each of the 43 guidelines. Four service delivery levels were identified, and a score was assigned to each level (Table). The tool was programmed in Qualtrics to provide a total score and average score per guideline for each FA domain and sub-domain. The task force added unscored questions about organizational demographics, barriers, and readiness to enable aggregate research and sub-group analysis. ACCC invited members of the Financial Advocacy Network to participate in a pilot via email invitation and provided opportunities for open-ended feedback. Results: 20 cancer centers participated in the pilot between March-May 2024. 15% were academic institutions and 85% were community-based programs (18% of which are directly affiliated with an academic institution). Respondents reported the tool was easy to use and informative for quality improvement efforts. See Table 1 for total scores for initial pilot. Conclusions: Pilot results reflect that all participating cancer centers are already engaged in some level of FA services. Broader dissemination and analysis is ongoing. The assessment provides centers with a practical resource to assess alignment to guidelines and identify opportunities for quality improvement. Regular review of aggregate results will help ACCC provide benchmarks for areas of service delivery, identify barriers to implementation, and monitor trends in FA staffing. 1. Kajdic Hodzic R, Liang MI, et al. Developing consensus-based oncology financial advocacy services guidelines. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023;19(suppl 11):38. Levels of FA service delivery and pilot total scores. Level Description % of pilot cancer centers Level 1 Not performing financial advocacy services. 0% Level 2 Making progress with financial advocacy services, but it is done informally or inconsistently. 35% Level 3 Performing financial advocacy services consistently in at least one key area of the organization. 60% Level 4 Reliably performing financial advocacy services across all key areas of the organization. 5%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.21
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a tool to assess financial advocacy service delivery.

Christina Mangir, Wendi Waugh, Aimee Hoch, Angie Santiago et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Development of a tool to assess financial advocacy service delivery.

Christina Mangir, Wendi Waugh, Aimee Hoch, Angie Santiago, Rifeta Kajdic Hodzic, Elana Plotkin, Lori Schneider, Margaret Liang, Ashley Lile, Jordan Karwedsky, Molly Kisiel, Emily Hope Carroll
article en

Abstract

21 Background: In 2023, the Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) Financial Advocacy Network published Financial Advocacy Services Guidelines developed through an expert-led, consensus-driven process (1). The Guidelines provide a framework for equitable delivery of financial advocacy (FA) services to address patients’ financial concerns. The Guidelines cover 3 domains: financial advocacy services and functions, program management functions, and partner engagement functions. ACCC adapted the Guidelines into a Financial Advocacy Services Assessment Tool to help cancer care organizations assess and improve service delivery and to advance research of organization-level FA practices across the U.S. Methods: ACCC convened an expert task force to guide this work. ACCC conducted a scan of implementation science literature and health care organizational assessments to inform the development of a rating system for each of the 43 guidelines. Four service delivery levels were identified, and a score was assigned to each level (Table). The tool was programmed in Qualtrics to provide a total score and average score per guideline for each FA domain and sub-domain. The task force added unscored questions about organizational demographics, barriers, and readiness to enable aggregate research and sub-group analysis. ACCC invited members of the Financial Advocacy Network to participate in a pilot via email invitation and provided opportunities for open-ended feedback. Results: 20 cancer centers participated in the pilot between March-May 2024. 15% were academic institutions and 85% were community-based programs (18% of which are directly affiliated with an academic institution). Respondents reported the tool was easy to use and informative for quality improvement efforts. See Table 1 for total scores for initial pilot. Conclusions: Pilot results reflect that all participating cancer centers are already engaged in some level of FA services. Broader dissemination and analysis is ongoing. The assessment provides centers with a practical resource to assess alignment to guidelines and identify opportunities for quality improvement. Regular review of aggregate results will help ACCC provide benchmarks for areas of service delivery, identify barriers to implementation, and monitor trends in FA staffing. 1. Kajdic Hodzic R, Liang MI, et al. Developing consensus-based oncology financial advocacy services guidelines. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023;19(suppl 11):38. Levels of FA service delivery and pilot total scores. Level Description % of pilot cancer centers Level 1 Not performing financial advocacy services. 0% Level 2 Making progress with financial advocacy services, but it is done informally or inconsistently. 35% Level 3 Performing financial advocacy services consistently in at least one key area of the organization. 60% Level 4 Reliably performing financial advocacy services across all key areas of the organization. 5%

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Green Bay (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Association of Community Cancer Centers (US), Southern Ohio Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.