Real-world molecular testing patterns in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the US.

395 Background: Targeted therapy can improve outcomes in women with pA/rEC, but real-world biomarker testing rates are unknown. This study estimated the real-world proportion of patients receiving biomarker testing (within ≤6 months of advanced/recurrent diagnosis) and characterized testing according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: We used the US Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database. Records from 1/1/2013 to 8/31/2023 for women ≥18 years old with advanced/recurrent EC were searched to identify testing for DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI), HER2, and estrogen or progesterone receptors (ER/PR); a subsample dataset from 4/1/2013 to 11/30/2022 was analyzed for additional biomarkers. The subsample has information on additional biomarker testing and was used to evaluate the frequency of testing for these biomarkers. Testing rates were evaluated using descriptive statistics; characteristics associated with testing were identified by multivariate logistic regression. Results: Among persons meeting eligibility criteria (n=2982), the mean age was 65 years; the majority were non-Hispanic White (56%), had commercial insurance (79%), and received care in a community setting (73%). The subsample (n=509) had similar characteristics to the full cohort. Between 2013-2022, 73% (n=2165) of patients received testing for any biomarker. Testing rates for individual biomarkers are shown in the Table. From 2013 to 2021, testing increased for MMR/MSI (17% to 81%), ER/PR (45% to 62%), and HER2 (15% to 43%). The likelihood of testing was higher among patients with primary advanced EC (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), endometrioid carcinoma histology (1.39; 1.01-1.93), commercial insurance (1.51; 1.18-1.93), at an academic facility (1.70; 1.37-2.11), and with no prior surgery (2.29; 1.83-2.86) relative to other attributes. Conclusions: Molecular testing has increased over time, indicating a continuous trend toward personalized treatment decisions. Several factors associated with an increased likelihood of biomarker testing were identified. Understanding these factors can inform approaches to increase access to molecular testing and increase testing rates. Biomarker testing rates, 2013-2022. Biomarker, n (%) 2013 2021 Overall MMR/MSI a 35 (15) 238 (80) 1604 (54) HER2 a 31 (14) 121 (41) 612 (21) ER/PR a 99 (43) 177 (59) 1465 (49) p53/ TP53 b 13 (36) 31 (74) 260 (51) TMB b 3 (8) 14 (33) 91 (18) CTNNB1 b 4 (11) 12 (29) 88 (17) ARID1A b 4 (11) 15 (36) 91 (18) CDK4/6 b 5 (14) 14 (33) 110 (22) POLE b 4 (11) 17 (40) 110 (22) ARID1A, AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; CTNNB1, catenin beta-1; POLE, polymerase-epsilon; TMB, tumor mutation burden. a 2013, n=228; 2021, n=298; overall, n=2982. b Rates from subsample dataset (4/1/2013 to 11/30/2022); 2013, n=36; 2021, n=42; overall, n=509.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.395
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world molecular testing patterns in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the US.

Solomon J. Lubinga, Scott David Ramsey, Troy Williams, Josh John Carlson et al.
1 citations
JCO Oncology Practice
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
0.58
article

Real-world molecular testing patterns in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the US.

Solomon J. Lubinga, Scott David Ramsey, Troy Williams, Josh John Carlson, Yilin Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

395 Background: Targeted therapy can improve outcomes in women with pA/rEC, but real-world biomarker testing rates are unknown. This study estimated the real-world proportion of patients receiving biomarker testing (within ≤6 months of advanced/recurrent diagnosis) and characterized testing according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: We used the US Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database. Records from 1/1/2013 to 8/31/2023 for women ≥18 years old with advanced/recurrent EC were searched to identify testing for DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI), HER2, and estrogen or progesterone receptors (ER/PR); a subsample dataset from 4/1/2013 to 11/30/2022 was analyzed for additional biomarkers. The subsample has information on additional biomarker testing and was used to evaluate the frequency of testing for these biomarkers. Testing rates were evaluated using descriptive statistics; characteristics associated with testing were identified by multivariate logistic regression. Results: Among persons meeting eligibility criteria (n=2982), the mean age was 65 years; the majority were non-Hispanic White (56%), had commercial insurance (79%), and received care in a community setting (73%). The subsample (n=509) had similar characteristics to the full cohort. Between 2013-2022, 73% (n=2165) of patients received testing for any biomarker. Testing rates for individual biomarkers are shown in the Table. From 2013 to 2021, testing increased for MMR/MSI (17% to 81%), ER/PR (45% to 62%), and HER2 (15% to 43%). The likelihood of testing was higher among patients with primary advanced EC (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), endometrioid carcinoma histology (1.39; 1.01-1.93), commercial insurance (1.51; 1.18-1.93), at an academic facility (1.70; 1.37-2.11), and with no prior surgery (2.29; 1.83-2.86) relative to other attributes. Conclusions: Molecular testing has increased over time, indicating a continuous trend toward personalized treatment decisions. Several factors associated with an increased likelihood of biomarker testing were identified. Understanding these factors can inform approaches to increase access to molecular testing and increase testing rates. Biomarker testing rates, 2013-2022. Biomarker, n (%) 2013 2021 Overall MMR/MSI a 35 (15) 238 (80) 1604 (54) HER2 a 31 (14) 121 (41) 612 (21) ER/PR a 99 (43) 177 (59) 1465 (49) p53/ TP53 b 13 (36) 31 (74) 260 (51) TMB b 3 (8) 14 (33) 91 (18) CTNNB1 b 4 (11) 12 (29) 88 (17) ARID1A b 4 (11) 15 (36) 91 (18) CDK4/6 b 5 (14) 14 (33) 110 (22) POLE b 4 (11) 17 (40) 110 (22) ARID1A, AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; CTNNB1, catenin beta-1; POLE, polymerase-epsilon; TMB, tumor mutation burden. a 2013, n=228; 2021, n=298; overall, n=2982. b Rates from subsample dataset (4/1/2013 to 11/30/2022); 2013, n=36; 2021, n=42; overall, n=509.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
University of Washington (US), GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US), Behavioral Tech Research, Inc. (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.