Association between Medicaid expansion and stage at diagnosis and treatment rates of non-small cell lung cancer.

87 Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, with Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common subtype. Under the Affordable Care Act, 39 states adopted Medicaid Expansion (ME) in 2014, while 12 did not. ME improved insurance coverage and lung cancer screening rates. This study examined the association between ME and NSCLC stage at diagnosis and treatment rates. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database including patients aged 55-64 diagnosed with NSCLC from 2007 to 2021. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the odds of Early NSCLC diagnosis (Stages 1 and 2) and odds of treatment for early NSCLC between ME states and non-ME states before and after 2014. Results: During the study period, 191,785 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC, of which 42,338 were early NSCLC. The odds of early NSCLC diagnosis and treatment in early NSCLC were similar in ME and non-ME states before 2014. After 2014, the odds of early NSCLC diagnosis were significantly higher in ME states [AOR-1.53 (1.45-1.63)] compared to non-ME states [AOR-1.34 (1.25-1.44)]. However, there was no significant difference in odds of treatment for early NSCLC in ME states [1.36 (1.01 -1.81) and non-ME states 1.25 (0.93-1.68) after 2014. Conclusions: We conclude that ME is associated with increased odds of early-stage diagnosis of NSCLC. However, the odds of receipt of treatment were not affected. These findings highlight the benefits of ME as an effective strategy to improve access to care, but also underscore that other barriers to receiving treatment exist despite early diagnosis. Further studies are warranted to identify the barriers and potential limitations of policy change to improve outcomes. Logistic analysis for odds of early-stage NSCLC diagnosis and odds of treatment in early NSCLC. Early NSCLC Diagnosis Odds Ratio p-value 95% Confidence Interval Non – ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.00 (Reference) Non – ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.34 0.00 1.25 - 1.44 ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.04 0.16 0.98 - 1.11 ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.53 0.00 1.45 - 1.63 Treatment of Early NSCLC Non - ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.00 (Reference) Non-ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.25 0.13 0.93-1.68 ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.40 0.05 1.00 - 1.95 ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.36 0.04 1.01- 1.81 NSCLC- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, ME- Medicaid Expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.87
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between Medicaid expansion and stage at diagnosis and treatment rates of non-small cell lung cancer.

Boniface Mensah, Joseph Atarere, Ted Akhiwu, Ramya Vasireddy et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Association between Medicaid expansion and stage at diagnosis and treatment rates of non-small cell lung cancer.

Boniface Mensah, Joseph Atarere, Ted Akhiwu, Ramya Vasireddy, Greeshma Nihitha Gaddipati, Simran Agrawal, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Greeshma Erasani, Pragnan Kancharla
article en

Abstract

87 Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, with Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common subtype. Under the Affordable Care Act, 39 states adopted Medicaid Expansion (ME) in 2014, while 12 did not. ME improved insurance coverage and lung cancer screening rates. This study examined the association between ME and NSCLC stage at diagnosis and treatment rates. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database including patients aged 55-64 diagnosed with NSCLC from 2007 to 2021. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the odds of Early NSCLC diagnosis (Stages 1 and 2) and odds of treatment for early NSCLC between ME states and non-ME states before and after 2014. Results: During the study period, 191,785 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC, of which 42,338 were early NSCLC. The odds of early NSCLC diagnosis and treatment in early NSCLC were similar in ME and non-ME states before 2014. After 2014, the odds of early NSCLC diagnosis were significantly higher in ME states [AOR-1.53 (1.45-1.63)] compared to non-ME states [AOR-1.34 (1.25-1.44)]. However, there was no significant difference in odds of treatment for early NSCLC in ME states [1.36 (1.01 -1.81) and non-ME states 1.25 (0.93-1.68) after 2014. Conclusions: We conclude that ME is associated with increased odds of early-stage diagnosis of NSCLC. However, the odds of receipt of treatment were not affected. These findings highlight the benefits of ME as an effective strategy to improve access to care, but also underscore that other barriers to receiving treatment exist despite early diagnosis. Further studies are warranted to identify the barriers and potential limitations of policy change to improve outcomes. Logistic analysis for odds of early-stage NSCLC diagnosis and odds of treatment in early NSCLC. Early NSCLC Diagnosis Odds Ratio p-value 95% Confidence Interval Non – ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.00 (Reference) Non – ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.34 0.00 1.25 - 1.44 ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.04 0.16 0.98 - 1.11 ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.53 0.00 1.45 - 1.63 Treatment of Early NSCLC Non - ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.00 (Reference) Non-ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.25 0.13 0.93-1.68 ME States (Pre- Expansion) 1.40 0.05 1.00 - 1.95 ME States (Post- Expansion) 1.36 0.04 1.01- 1.81 NSCLC- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, ME- Medicaid Expansion.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center (US), MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.