Provider discussions about cardiovascular health factors by cancer type, provider type, and patient age (results from WF-1804CD).

378 Background: Results from the Automated Heart-Health Assessment study (AH-HA, R01CA226078) demonstrate the electronic health record clinical decision support tool is effective at promoting cardiovascular health (CVH) discussions in outpatient oncology. In this analysis, we compared the prevalence of CVH topics [blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose/A1c, body mass index (BMI), smoking, physical activity (PA), and diet] discussed. Methods: The Wake Forest NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base (UG1CA189824)coordinated a practice-randomized trial (WF-1804CD, NCT# 03935282). We compared intervention and usual care practices by the CVH topics discussed among those patients with non-ideal or missing CVH at baseline (those considered “in need”), as well as potential differences by cancer type (breast, endometrial, others), provider type (MD vs APP), and patient age (<50, 50-64, 65+). Results: We enrolled 645 cancer patients at 9 AH-HA practices (4 intervention, 5 usual care). Most had breast cancer (82.3%), were female (95.7%) and white (83.9%, white/non-Hispanic, 7.8% Black; 3.7% Hispanic), with a median of 3.7 years since diagnosis. Providers in intervention vs usual care practices were more likely to discuss all CVH factors (all p<.0001). BMI, PA, and diet were the most common topics discussed in both arms. Blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose/A1c were discussed for >66% of intervention vs <20% usual care patients. Breast and endometrial cancer patients were more likely to discuss PA and diet vs others (p<.05); breast cancer survivors were least likely to discuss smoking (p<.05). Patients who saw APPs vs MDs were more likely to discuss cholesterol and BMI (p<.05). Older patients (50-64 and 65+) were more likely to discuss glucose/A1c vs younger patients (p<.05). Conclusions: CVH discussions among patients with elevated or unknown risk were more common in AH-HA vs usual care practices. There were subtle differences by cancer type, provider type, and age, suggesting opportunities for expanded tool reach. Clinical trial information: 03935282 . Self-reported discussions among those with CVH factors categorized as poor/intermediate/missing at baseline OverallN=645 Usual Care AH-HA N % N % N % Blood pressure 255 47.4 56 19.3 199 79.9 Cholesterol 237 46.5 45 16.7 192 80.0 Glucose/A1c 221 38.0 39 12.8 182 65.9 BMI 308 60.9 103 37.6 206 88.4 Smoking 26 55.3 8 29.6 18 85.7 PA 213 65.1 70 39.3 144 96.0 Diet 351 62.3 92 31.2 259 96.3

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.378
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provider discussions about cardiovascular health factors by cancer type, provider type, and patient age (results from WF-1804CD).

Stephanie J. Sohl, Heidi D. Klepin, Randi E. Foraker, Simon J. Craddock Lee et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Provider discussions about cardiovascular health factors by cancer type, provider type, and patient age (results from WF-1804CD).

Stephanie J. Sohl, Heidi D. Klepin, Randi E. Foraker, Simon J. Craddock Lee, Kathryn E. Weaver, Sydney A. Smith, Emily V. Dressler, Chandylen L. Nightingale
article en

Abstract

378 Background: Results from the Automated Heart-Health Assessment study (AH-HA, R01CA226078) demonstrate the electronic health record clinical decision support tool is effective at promoting cardiovascular health (CVH) discussions in outpatient oncology. In this analysis, we compared the prevalence of CVH topics [blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose/A1c, body mass index (BMI), smoking, physical activity (PA), and diet] discussed. Methods: The Wake Forest NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base (UG1CA189824)coordinated a practice-randomized trial (WF-1804CD, NCT# 03935282). We compared intervention and usual care practices by the CVH topics discussed among those patients with non-ideal or missing CVH at baseline (those considered “in need”), as well as potential differences by cancer type (breast, endometrial, others), provider type (MD vs APP), and patient age (<50, 50-64, 65+). Results: We enrolled 645 cancer patients at 9 AH-HA practices (4 intervention, 5 usual care). Most had breast cancer (82.3%), were female (95.7%) and white (83.9%, white/non-Hispanic, 7.8% Black; 3.7% Hispanic), with a median of 3.7 years since diagnosis. Providers in intervention vs usual care practices were more likely to discuss all CVH factors (all p<.0001). BMI, PA, and diet were the most common topics discussed in both arms. Blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose/A1c were discussed for >66% of intervention vs <20% usual care patients. Breast and endometrial cancer patients were more likely to discuss PA and diet vs others (p<.05); breast cancer survivors were least likely to discuss smoking (p<.05). Patients who saw APPs vs MDs were more likely to discuss cholesterol and BMI (p<.05). Older patients (50-64 and 65+) were more likely to discuss glucose/A1c vs younger patients (p<.05). Conclusions: CVH discussions among patients with elevated or unknown risk were more common in AH-HA vs usual care practices. There were subtle differences by cancer type, provider type, and age, suggesting opportunities for expanded tool reach. Clinical trial information: 03935282 . Self-reported discussions among those with CVH factors categorized as poor/intermediate/missing at baseline OverallN=645 Usual Care AH-HA N % N % N % Blood pressure 255 47.4 56 19.3 199 79.9 Cholesterol 237 46.5 45 16.7 192 80.0 Glucose/A1c 221 38.0 39 12.8 182 65.9 BMI 308 60.9 103 37.6 206 88.4 Smoking 26 55.3 8 29.6 18 85.7 PA 213 65.1 70 39.3 144 96.0 Diet 351 62.3 92 31.2 259 96.3

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), University of Kansas (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.