Disparities in cancer mortality outcomes among adult immigrants in the United States.

134 Background: The “immigrant health paradox” posits that immigrants are generally healthier than US natives of similar demographic and socioeconomic background. However, immigrant noncitizens with cancer face unique barriers to care, including limited access to routine screening and continuous healthcare coverage, which may portend worse outcomes. Methods: The 2011-2018 National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality Files were used to identify all adult (age ≥18 years) US natives, foreign-born citizens, and noncitizens with a cancer history. Differences by group were assessed using the chi-squared test with Rao & Scott’s second-order correction. Cox-proportional hazards models tested associations between nativity/citizenship status and cancer-specific (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM), adjusted by age, gender, and survey year. Sequential models separately tested the added effects of individual patient-level covariates selected a priori —including race/ethnicity, smoking status, region, educational attainment, employment, insurance status, and having a usual source of care. Results: A total of 23,603,743 US natives, 1,647,188 foreign-born citizens and 477,861 noncitizens met criteria for inclusion. Compared to US natives, immigrants had significantly greater distribution of gastroesophageal (2.3%, noncitizens vs 2.3%, foreign-born citizens vs 1.0%, US natives, p <0.001), head & neck (8.4% vs 6.2% vs 4.4%, p =0.003), and lung cancers (3.1% vs 4.2% vs 2.8%, p =0.03). Of the1,302,0771 US natives, 105,258 foreign-born citizens, and 21,937 noncitizens who died during the study period, cancer was the primary cause of death for 52% of noncitizens and 62% of foreign-born citizens (vs 44%, p <0.001). Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis in this group, accounting for 40% of cancer deaths among non-citizens (vs 19% vs 13%; p =0.03). Relative to US natives, foreign-born citizens had a significantly lower risk of all-cause (adjusted HR [95%CI], 0.67 [0.54-0.83]) but not cancer-specific mortality (0.94 [0.71-1.23]); no differences in mortality risk among noncitizens were observed. On subset analysis limited to adults with lung cancer, noncitizens had over twice the hazard of cancer death (2.72 [1.22-6.09]) as well as death from any cause (2.14 [1.01-4.55]). While the association with ACM was no longer significant in sequential models, the association remained significant for CSM. Importantly, insurance status attenuated but did not eliminate the risk of lung cancer death for noncitizens (2.63 [1.16-5.96]). Conclusions: Although immigrant noncitizens did not have a significantly greater risk of cancer death overall, those with lung cancer were more than twice as likely to die from their disease, even after adjustment for patient-level variables, including insurance status and having a usual source of care. Future research is warranted to identify root causes and potential points for intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in cancer mortality outcomes among adult immigrants in the United States.

K. Robin Yabroff, Fumiko Chino, Lilia Cervantes, Patricia Mae G. Santos et al.
1 citations
JCO Oncology Practice
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.28
article

Disparities in cancer mortality outcomes among adult immigrants in the United States.

K. Robin Yabroff, Fumiko Chino, Lilia Cervantes, Patricia Mae G. Santos, Justin M. Barnes, Lillian A. Boe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

134 Background: The “immigrant health paradox” posits that immigrants are generally healthier than US natives of similar demographic and socioeconomic background. However, immigrant noncitizens with cancer face unique barriers to care, including limited access to routine screening and continuous healthcare coverage, which may portend worse outcomes. Methods: The 2011-2018 National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality Files were used to identify all adult (age ≥18 years) US natives, foreign-born citizens, and noncitizens with a cancer history. Differences by group were assessed using the chi-squared test with Rao & Scott’s second-order correction. Cox-proportional hazards models tested associations between nativity/citizenship status and cancer-specific (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM), adjusted by age, gender, and survey year. Sequential models separately tested the added effects of individual patient-level covariates selected a priori —including race/ethnicity, smoking status, region, educational attainment, employment, insurance status, and having a usual source of care. Results: A total of 23,603,743 US natives, 1,647,188 foreign-born citizens and 477,861 noncitizens met criteria for inclusion. Compared to US natives, immigrants had significantly greater distribution of gastroesophageal (2.3%, noncitizens vs 2.3%, foreign-born citizens vs 1.0%, US natives, p <0.001), head & neck (8.4% vs 6.2% vs 4.4%, p =0.003), and lung cancers (3.1% vs 4.2% vs 2.8%, p =0.03). Of the1,302,0771 US natives, 105,258 foreign-born citizens, and 21,937 noncitizens who died during the study period, cancer was the primary cause of death for 52% of noncitizens and 62% of foreign-born citizens (vs 44%, p <0.001). Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis in this group, accounting for 40% of cancer deaths among non-citizens (vs 19% vs 13%; p =0.03). Relative to US natives, foreign-born citizens had a significantly lower risk of all-cause (adjusted HR [95%CI], 0.67 [0.54-0.83]) but not cancer-specific mortality (0.94 [0.71-1.23]); no differences in mortality risk among noncitizens were observed. On subset analysis limited to adults with lung cancer, noncitizens had over twice the hazard of cancer death (2.72 [1.22-6.09]) as well as death from any cause (2.14 [1.01-4.55]). While the association with ACM was no longer significant in sequential models, the association remained significant for CSM. Importantly, insurance status attenuated but did not eliminate the risk of lung cancer death for noncitizens (2.63 [1.16-5.96]). Conclusions: Although immigrant noncitizens did not have a significantly greater risk of cancer death overall, those with lung cancer were more than twice as likely to die from their disease, even after adjustment for patient-level variables, including insurance status and having a usual source of care. Future research is warranted to identify root causes and potential points for intervention.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
American Cancer Society (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Commonwealth Fund, Conquer Cancer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.