Accelerating access: The power of gold carding in reducing treatment delays.

114 Background: Delays in time to treatment initiation (TTI) for cancer patients have been shown to impact survival/mortality/outcomes, and cause patient distress. The process of obtaining prior authorizations (PA) often leads to significant treatment delays, affecting patient outcomes and posing administrative challenges for healthcare providers. PAs have become a ubiquitous part of modern healthcare, aimed at ensuring appropriate utilization of medical treatments and reducing costs. In recent years, the concept of gold carding (GC), a practice where payers waive PA on services and prescription drugs ordered by providers with a proven track record of PA approvals based on guideline concordance or pathway adherence, has gained attention as a potential solution to provide administrative relief to all stakeholders affected by the PA process. This abstract seeks to explore the impact of GC on TTI for a large multi-site community-based oncology practice in The US Oncology Network having a GC contract with a regional payer. Methods: Using administrative claims data from 2021 to 2023, we derived a population of cancer patients who initiated chemotherapy as their first treatment, calculated the TTI (time from the date of first consultation to the date of treatment initiation), and compared TTI between GC and non-GC patients. Results: The average TTI for 4,836 patients that met the inclusion criteria was 26.3 days. Patients initiating therapy under a GC eligible payer coverage started therapy 4.5 days earlier (22.13 days vs 26.68 days, p<0.00001, Kruskal–Wallis test). 80% of GC eligible patients started their treatment within 30 days of their initial consultation. Conclusions: The findings indicate that gold carding has the potential to expedite the time to treatment initiation for cancer patients. Further research is needed to quantify the cost savings, patient and provider satisfaction, and other intangible benefits from GC. Gold carding offers a viable approach to balance guideline concordant care with lowering administrative burden. We enthusiastically support legislative reforms that encourage gold carding and selectively implement prior authorization requirements based on stratification of health care providers’ performance and adherence to evidence-based medicine. Patient Count Average TTI (days) GC 401 22.13 Commercial 217 21.13 Managed Medicare 184 23.32 Non-GC 4435 26.68 Commercial 1610 25.41 Managed Medicare 1405 27.37 Medicare 959 26.48 Managed Medicaid 254 29.06 Medicaid 112 29.54 All Other 95 30.15

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.114
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accelerating access: The power of gold carding in reducing treatment delays.

Puneeth Indurlal, Rajini Katipamula Malisetti, Gunjan Sharma, John Albaugh et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Accelerating access: The power of gold carding in reducing treatment delays.

Puneeth Indurlal, Rajini Katipamula Malisetti, Gunjan Sharma, John Albaugh, Jean A. Gress, Lora Markley, Alice Francis
article en

Abstract

114 Background: Delays in time to treatment initiation (TTI) for cancer patients have been shown to impact survival/mortality/outcomes, and cause patient distress. The process of obtaining prior authorizations (PA) often leads to significant treatment delays, affecting patient outcomes and posing administrative challenges for healthcare providers. PAs have become a ubiquitous part of modern healthcare, aimed at ensuring appropriate utilization of medical treatments and reducing costs. In recent years, the concept of gold carding (GC), a practice where payers waive PA on services and prescription drugs ordered by providers with a proven track record of PA approvals based on guideline concordance or pathway adherence, has gained attention as a potential solution to provide administrative relief to all stakeholders affected by the PA process. This abstract seeks to explore the impact of GC on TTI for a large multi-site community-based oncology practice in The US Oncology Network having a GC contract with a regional payer. Methods: Using administrative claims data from 2021 to 2023, we derived a population of cancer patients who initiated chemotherapy as their first treatment, calculated the TTI (time from the date of first consultation to the date of treatment initiation), and compared TTI between GC and non-GC patients. Results: The average TTI for 4,836 patients that met the inclusion criteria was 26.3 days. Patients initiating therapy under a GC eligible payer coverage started therapy 4.5 days earlier (22.13 days vs 26.68 days, p<0.00001, Kruskal–Wallis test). 80% of GC eligible patients started their treatment within 30 days of their initial consultation. Conclusions: The findings indicate that gold carding has the potential to expedite the time to treatment initiation for cancer patients. Further research is needed to quantify the cost savings, patient and provider satisfaction, and other intangible benefits from GC. Gold carding offers a viable approach to balance guideline concordant care with lowering administrative burden. We enthusiastically support legislative reforms that encourage gold carding and selectively implement prior authorization requirements based on stratification of health care providers’ performance and adherence to evidence-based medicine. Patient Count Average TTI (days) GC 401 22.13 Commercial 217 21.13 Managed Medicare 184 23.32 Non-GC 4435 26.68 Commercial 1610 25.41 Managed Medicare 1405 27.37 Medicare 959 26.48 Managed Medicaid 254 29.06 Medicaid 112 29.54 All Other 95 30.15

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
McKesson (United States) (US), The US Oncology Network (US), Minnesota Oncology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.