Geographic residence of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

135 Background: Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are utilized to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but difficult to treat adverse event of BMAs. There are known patient and treatment related risk factors for development of ONJ, however, little is known on social and geographic risks. In patients with bone metastases and concurrent MRONJ, we seek to describe differences in patient's geographic residence (rural versus urban) with other social factors as secondary outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center patients in the date range of 01/01/2013 to 11/01/2023. Included were patients with metastatic breast cancer, metastatic prostate cancer or multiple myeloma who had a diagnosis of MRONJ. We recorded Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, alcohol use, body mass index, insurance status, type of cancer, type of BMA, and cumulative dosing of BMAs. Patients were defined as rural or urban based on criteria from the health resources and services administration website. Relative socioeconomic advantage versus disadvantage was determined by the patients’ ADIs with a decile rank from 1-10 for state ADIs and a percentile rank of 1-100 for national ADIs. SAS software (version 9.4) was used for data analysis (2023, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Results: A total of 88 patients met inclusion criteria. 64% of patients lived in urban areas and 36% in rural. Demographic features of the identified patients are listed in table 1. MRONJ patients from both urban and rural areas had an above average national and state ADI, with a trend toward higher ADIs in rural locations compared to urban locations; mean of 6.7 vs 5.3 state ADI and mean 70.6 vs 62.0 national ADI, for rural and urban patients respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between rural and urban patients in any of the demographic or health-related characteristics we examined. Conclusions: Patients with bone metastases and MRONJ in our cohort demonstrate relative socioeconomic disadvantage in comparison to national and state averages. In comparing the rural with urban patients, however, we observed relatively similar profiles. Patient characteristics by rural/urban status. Rural (n=32) Urban (n=56) Age in years (mean, sd) 64 (11.3) 65 (10.9) Sex, N (%) Male 19 (59) 29 (52) Female 13 (41) 27 (48) Race, N (%) Non-Hispanic White 30 (93.8) 40 (71.4) Non-Hispanic Black 1 (3.1) 11 (19.6) Hispanic 1 (3.1) 3 (5.4) Non-Hispanic Asian 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) Other 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) State ADI (mean, sd) 6.7 (2.4) 5.5 (2.7) National ADI (mean, sd) 70.6 (16.9) 62.0 (23.8) Former/current smoker, N (%) 18 (56.3) 25 (44.6) Medicaid/Medicare, N (%) 16 (50.0) 16 (28.6) Months on BMA (mean, sd) 37.2 (35.5) 40.3 (38.2)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.135
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographic residence of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Emily Douglas, John T. McKay, Mary-Peyton Knapp, Benjamin Rush et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Bone health and treatments
article

Geographic residence of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Emily Douglas, John T. McKay, Mary-Peyton Knapp, Benjamin Rush, Beverly J. Levine
article en

Abstract

135 Background: Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are utilized to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but difficult to treat adverse event of BMAs. There are known patient and treatment related risk factors for development of ONJ, however, little is known on social and geographic risks. In patients with bone metastases and concurrent MRONJ, we seek to describe differences in patient's geographic residence (rural versus urban) with other social factors as secondary outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center patients in the date range of 01/01/2013 to 11/01/2023. Included were patients with metastatic breast cancer, metastatic prostate cancer or multiple myeloma who had a diagnosis of MRONJ. We recorded Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, alcohol use, body mass index, insurance status, type of cancer, type of BMA, and cumulative dosing of BMAs. Patients were defined as rural or urban based on criteria from the health resources and services administration website. Relative socioeconomic advantage versus disadvantage was determined by the patients’ ADIs with a decile rank from 1-10 for state ADIs and a percentile rank of 1-100 for national ADIs. SAS software (version 9.4) was used for data analysis (2023, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Results: A total of 88 patients met inclusion criteria. 64% of patients lived in urban areas and 36% in rural. Demographic features of the identified patients are listed in table 1. MRONJ patients from both urban and rural areas had an above average national and state ADI, with a trend toward higher ADIs in rural locations compared to urban locations; mean of 6.7 vs 5.3 state ADI and mean 70.6 vs 62.0 national ADI, for rural and urban patients respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between rural and urban patients in any of the demographic or health-related characteristics we examined. Conclusions: Patients with bone metastases and MRONJ in our cohort demonstrate relative socioeconomic disadvantage in comparison to national and state averages. In comparing the rural with urban patients, however, we observed relatively similar profiles. Patient characteristics by rural/urban status. Rural (n=32) Urban (n=56) Age in years (mean, sd) 64 (11.3) 65 (10.9) Sex, N (%) Male 19 (59) 29 (52) Female 13 (41) 27 (48) Race, N (%) Non-Hispanic White 30 (93.8) 40 (71.4) Non-Hispanic Black 1 (3.1) 11 (19.6) Hispanic 1 (3.1) 3 (5.4) Non-Hispanic Asian 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) Other 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) State ADI (mean, sd) 6.7 (2.4) 5.5 (2.7) National ADI (mean, sd) 70.6 (16.9) 62.0 (23.8) Former/current smoker, N (%) 18 (56.3) 25 (44.6) Medicaid/Medicare, N (%) 16 (50.0) 16 (28.6) Months on BMA (mean, sd) 37.2 (35.5) 40.3 (38.2)

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.