Adaptive physical education learning: evaluation by teachers of deaf students at special elementary schools

Purpose This research aims to evaluate adaptive physical education learning in deaf students at special elementary schools. Methods This study employs an evaluation model approach to assess the efficacy of adaptive physical education instruction. Specifically, this research utilizes the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) model for evaluation. The participants in this study were teachers who taught physical education in West Sumatra, with a sample size of 60 teachers in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Data collection was carried out using a research instrument in the form of a questionnaire administered via Google Forms. The results showed that all statement items of the questionnaire were valid for reliability testing. Results The results of this research showed that the evaluation using the context and input components of the CIPP scored 74.32% and 70.71%, respectively, indicating both as good. However, the process and product aspects attained a score of 50.83% and 48.10% indicating them as enough. Conclusions This research concluded that the implementation of adaptive physical education learning for deaf students was good. Based on the results, this research recommends that evaluations be conducted at the school level for students with special needs. Additionally, evaluation is also needed using participants involved in education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Movement
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/hm/192889
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive physical education learning: evaluation by teachers of deaf students at special elementary schools

Ridho Bahtra, Francesca Latino, Gema Fitriady, Rivan Saghita Pratama et al.
2 citations
Human Movement
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
2.26
article

Adaptive physical education learning: evaluation by teachers of deaf students at special elementary schools

Ridho Bahtra, Francesca Latino, Gema Fitriady, Rivan Saghita Pratama, Muhamad Sazeli Rifki, Hendra Setyawan, Septyaningrum Putri Purwoto, Muhamad Syamsul Taufik, Khoırıl Anam, Özgür Eken, José Vicente Garcí­a-Jiménez, Nugroho Susanto, Abdul Hafidz, Francesco Tafuri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to evaluate adaptive physical education learning in deaf students at special elementary schools. Methods This study employs an evaluation model approach to assess the efficacy of adaptive physical education instruction. Specifically, this research utilizes the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) model for evaluation. The participants in this study were teachers who taught physical education in West Sumatra, with a sample size of 60 teachers in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Data collection was carried out using a research instrument in the form of a questionnaire administered via Google Forms. The results showed that all statement items of the questionnaire were valid for reliability testing. Results The results of this research showed that the evaluation using the context and input components of the CIPP scored 74.32% and 70.71%, respectively, indicating both as good. However, the process and product aspects attained a score of 50.83% and 48.10% indicating them as enough. Conclusions This research concluded that the implementation of adaptive physical education learning for deaf students was good. Based on the results, this research recommends that evaluations be conducted at the school level for students with special needs. Additionally, evaluation is also needed using participants involved in education.

Human MovementVol. 25(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.