Comparison of Studies Conducted in the Field of Neuromarketing and Artificial Intelligence Using Bibliometric Method

Abstract Neuromarketing research focuses on consumer purchase intention, decision-making processes, purchase behavior, brand awareness, brand loyalty, and repeat purchase behavior. In these studies, consumer behavior has been analyzed using neuroscientific methods and tools. The most commonly used tools include Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Eye Tracking, Electroencephalogram (EEG), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Magnetoencephalogram (MEG), Steady State Topography (SST), Implicit Association Test (IAT), Facial Electromyography (fEMG), Automatic Face Coding (AFC), Skin Conductance Response (SCR), and other methods for measuring physiological responses. However, the use of these neuroscientific tools is not always possible due to economic constraints and lack of experimental design. Neuroscientific imaging and measurement methods are not preferred in every study due to their high costs and expertise requirements. However, when neuromarketing studies are examined, it is seen that methods such as Eye Tracking, EEG and fMRI are used more widely. These tools contribute to a deeper understanding of consumer behavior. In order to better analyze consumer behavior, it is of great importance to convey marketing stimuli and messages correctly. In the field of marketing, the effect of stimuli conveyed to consumers using the five senses is one of the focal points of neuromarketing. More than one neuroscientific method should be used together to understand consumer intentions, thoughts and purchasing behaviors. In this way, the obtained data can be analyzed more comprehensively and clearer insights can be provided about neuromarketing. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive assessment of the use of neuroscientific tools by examining the publications in the field of neuromarketing in the Web of Science database between 2010-2024 with bibliometric analysis. The study will address the limitations of not using more than one neuroscientific tool together in neuromarketing research and the inadequacy of analyses supported by artificial intelligence. A more holistic approach will be proposed to address these shortcomings and a guiding resource for future research will be created.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1416687
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Studies Conducted in the Field of Neuromarketing and Artificial Intelligence Using Bibliometric Method

Abdullah Ballı
1 citations
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
article

Comparison of Studies Conducted in the Field of Neuromarketing and Artificial Intelligence Using Bibliometric Method

Abdullah Ballı
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Neuromarketing research focuses on consumer purchase intention, decision-making processes, purchase behavior, brand awareness, brand loyalty, and repeat purchase behavior. In these studies, consumer behavior has been analyzed using neuroscientific methods and tools. The most commonly used tools include Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Eye Tracking, Electroencephalogram (EEG), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Magnetoencephalogram (MEG), Steady State Topography (SST), Implicit Association Test (IAT), Facial Electromyography (fEMG), Automatic Face Coding (AFC), Skin Conductance Response (SCR), and other methods for measuring physiological responses. However, the use of these neuroscientific tools is not always possible due to economic constraints and lack of experimental design. Neuroscientific imaging and measurement methods are not preferred in every study due to their high costs and expertise requirements. However, when neuromarketing studies are examined, it is seen that methods such as Eye Tracking, EEG and fMRI are used more widely. These tools contribute to a deeper understanding of consumer behavior. In order to better analyze consumer behavior, it is of great importance to convey marketing stimuli and messages correctly. In the field of marketing, the effect of stimuli conveyed to consumers using the five senses is one of the focal points of neuromarketing. More than one neuroscientific method should be used together to understand consumer intentions, thoughts and purchasing behaviors. In this way, the obtained data can be analyzed more comprehensively and clearer insights can be provided about neuromarketing. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive assessment of the use of neuroscientific tools by examining the publications in the field of neuromarketing in the Web of Science database between 2010-2024 with bibliometric analysis. The study will address the limitations of not using more than one neuroscientific tool together in neuromarketing research and the inadequacy of analyses supported by artificial intelligence. A more holistic approach will be proposed to address these shortcomings and a guiding resource for future research will be created.

Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Ostim Technical University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.