Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation from User Generated Text

Abstract User-generated content provides a rich resource to study social and behavioral phenomena. Although its application potential is currently limited by the paucity of expert labels and the privacy risks inherent in personal data, synthetic data can help mitigate this bottleneck. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework to facilitate research on synthetic language data generation for user-generated text. We define a set of aspects for assessing data quality, namely, style preservation, meaning preservation, and divergence, as a proxy for privacy. We introduce metrics corresponding to each aspect. Moreover, through a set of generation strategies and representative tasks and baselines across domains, we demonstrate the relation between the quality aspects of synthetic user generated content, generation strategies, metrics, and downstream performance. To our knowledge, our work is the first unified evaluation framework for user-generated text in relation to the specified aspects, offering both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. We envisage it will facilitate developments towards shareable, high-quality synthetic language data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Linguistics
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00540
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation from User Generated Text

Maria Liakata, Julia Ive, Jenny Chim
4 citations
Computational Linguistics
Semantic Web and Ontologies
1.39
article

Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation from User Generated Text

Maria Liakata, Julia Ive, Jenny Chim
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract User-generated content provides a rich resource to study social and behavioral phenomena. Although its application potential is currently limited by the paucity of expert labels and the privacy risks inherent in personal data, synthetic data can help mitigate this bottleneck. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework to facilitate research on synthetic language data generation for user-generated text. We define a set of aspects for assessing data quality, namely, style preservation, meaning preservation, and divergence, as a proxy for privacy. We introduce metrics corresponding to each aspect. Moreover, through a set of generation strategies and representative tasks and baselines across domains, we demonstrate the relation between the quality aspects of synthetic user generated content, generation strategies, metrics, and downstream performance. To our knowledge, our work is the first unified evaluation framework for user-generated text in relation to the specified aspects, offering both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. We envisage it will facilitate developments towards shareable, high-quality synthetic language data.

Computational LinguisticsVol. 51(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, DeepMind, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation from User Generated Text — Maria Liakata, Julia Ive, et al. · Computational Linguistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS