Impact of Medicaid expansion on receipt of pancreatectomy in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

106 Background: Pancreatic cancer is estimated to rank third in cancer-related mortality in 2024 by the American Cancer Society. Despite the proven increase in 5-year survival with pancreatectomy in Early Pancreatic Cancer (EPC), it is nationally underutilized. Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act is associated with gains in insurance coverage and early cancer diagnosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, its impact on the receipt of pancreatectomy in EPC remains unclear. In this study, we looked at the impact of ME on the uptake of pancreatectomy in EPC. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, which included patients diagnosed with EPC (Stage 1 and Stage 2) between 2006 and 2021. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of ME on the uptake of pancreatectomy in patients with EPC in states that expanded vs. states that did not, with 2014 as an inflection point for policy implementation. Results: During this study period, 29,384 were diagnosed with EPC, 10,777 patients were diagnosed pre-ME and 18,607 post-ME. The odds of receipt of pancreatectomy for EPC in non-expansion states after 2014 was 20% higher than before 2014. However, this was not statistically significant [AOR – 1.20 (0.98-1.48)]. There was also no significant difference between the odds of receipt of treatment for EPC for ME states before [AOR- 1.27 (1.06-1.51)] and after [AOR-1.21 (1.01-1.44)] 2014. Increasing age, male sex, Black and Hispanic race, having an income lower than $65,000, and living in less populated areas were all associated with lower odds of receipt of pancreatectomy in EPC. Conclusions: ME was not associated with increased uptake of pancreatectomy in EPC. However, prior studies have shown that ME is linked to an earlier stage at pancreatic cancer diagnosis. This suggests that despite earlier diagnosis, other barriers to receiving treatment exist. Future studies are warranted to identify the limitations of policy change to improve outcomes of such aggressive cancer. Logistic regression for receipt of pancreatectomy in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Receipt of Surgical Treatment for Early Pancreatic cancer Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Non- ME States (Pre-Expansion) 1.00 (Reference) Non- ME States (Post -Expansion) 1.20 (0.98-1.48) ME States (Pre-Expansion) 1.27 (1.06-1.51) ME States (Post-Expansion) 1.21 (1.01-1.44) ME- Medicaid expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.106
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Medicaid expansion on receipt of pancreatectomy in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

Boniface Mensah, Joseph Atarere, Ted Akhiwu, Ramya Vasireddy et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Impact of Medicaid expansion on receipt of pancreatectomy in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

Boniface Mensah, Joseph Atarere, Ted Akhiwu, Ramya Vasireddy, Greeshma Nihitha Gaddipati, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Tanmay Singh, Pragnan Kancharla, Simardeep Singh
article en

Abstract

106 Background: Pancreatic cancer is estimated to rank third in cancer-related mortality in 2024 by the American Cancer Society. Despite the proven increase in 5-year survival with pancreatectomy in Early Pancreatic Cancer (EPC), it is nationally underutilized. Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act is associated with gains in insurance coverage and early cancer diagnosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, its impact on the receipt of pancreatectomy in EPC remains unclear. In this study, we looked at the impact of ME on the uptake of pancreatectomy in EPC. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, which included patients diagnosed with EPC (Stage 1 and Stage 2) between 2006 and 2021. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of ME on the uptake of pancreatectomy in patients with EPC in states that expanded vs. states that did not, with 2014 as an inflection point for policy implementation. Results: During this study period, 29,384 were diagnosed with EPC, 10,777 patients were diagnosed pre-ME and 18,607 post-ME. The odds of receipt of pancreatectomy for EPC in non-expansion states after 2014 was 20% higher than before 2014. However, this was not statistically significant [AOR – 1.20 (0.98-1.48)]. There was also no significant difference between the odds of receipt of treatment for EPC for ME states before [AOR- 1.27 (1.06-1.51)] and after [AOR-1.21 (1.01-1.44)] 2014. Increasing age, male sex, Black and Hispanic race, having an income lower than $65,000, and living in less populated areas were all associated with lower odds of receipt of pancreatectomy in EPC. Conclusions: ME was not associated with increased uptake of pancreatectomy in EPC. However, prior studies have shown that ME is linked to an earlier stage at pancreatic cancer diagnosis. This suggests that despite earlier diagnosis, other barriers to receiving treatment exist. Future studies are warranted to identify the limitations of policy change to improve outcomes of such aggressive cancer. Logistic regression for receipt of pancreatectomy in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Receipt of Surgical Treatment for Early Pancreatic cancer Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Non- ME States (Pre-Expansion) 1.00 (Reference) Non- ME States (Post -Expansion) 1.20 (0.98-1.48) ME States (Pre-Expansion) 1.27 (1.06-1.51) ME States (Post-Expansion) 1.21 (1.01-1.44) ME- Medicaid expansion.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center (US), MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.