Effect of an oncology care management program on ED visits in a rural Medicaid population.

175 Background: Optum’s Cancer Support Program (CSP) provides care management to members with cancer diagnoses facing healthcare barriers. CSP nurses educate members on symptom management, palliative care and advance care planning, address psychosocial needs and close gaps in care. Improving health equity and outcomes is a program priority. In 2023, Optum analyzed outpatient claims for 24,221 Medicaid members with cancer and found that rural members visit emergency departments (ED) 31% more than urban members. As part of a CSP quality and outcomes assessment, we aimed to understand CSP’s impact on ED utilization within a high-risk rural Medicaid population. Methods: Beginning 1/1/23, Medicaid members in rural zip codes with an active cancer diagnosis were stratified as high- or low-risk based on diagnosis and clinical factors. High-risk members were invited to participate in CSP and receive individualized telephonic care management. 2023 outpatient medical claims were evaluated, and rural ED visit rates were compared for high-risk CSP participants and non-participants for approximately 4 months (average CSP engagement) after CSP enrollment or identification (non-participants). Population demographics were tested via a Mood's median test; ED visits per thousand members per year (PTMPY)—engaged, non-engaged, and difference in means—was tested via a 10,000-iteration bootstrap. Results: The study population included 421 members stratified as high-risk. Of those, 38% (161) enrolled in CSP. Reasons for non-enrollment included inability to reach the member (61%) and member refused (39%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups’ demographic composition (all variables had p ≥ 0.05). Under a 10,000-iteration bootstrap, there were 2,696 ED visits PTMPY, 80% CI [2,258, 3,150] in the participant group and 3,427 ED visits PTMPY, 80% CI [2,904, 3,974] in the non-participant group. The difference in means between the groups was 730 ED visits PTMPY, 80% CI [52, 1,421]. Conclusions: Rural Medicaid members enrolled in CSP experienced lower ED visit rates, suggesting that care management may be effective at reducing ED utilization within rural populations that lack access to wraparound oncology services. Limitations of this study include small sample size and potential enrollment bias. Further analysis is underway to increase the study sample size and identify other factors that may be impacted by care management, thereby improving healthcare equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.175
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of an oncology care management program on ED visits in a rural Medicaid population.

Wendy L. French, Tracy E. Spinks, Erica Stevens, Lisa Latts et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Effect of an oncology care management program on ED visits in a rural Medicaid population.

Wendy L. French, Tracy E. Spinks, Erica Stevens, Lisa Latts, Callie B. Beagley, Angelica I. Norrell, Elizabeth P. Wasserman, Sarah Geis
article en

Abstract

175 Background: Optum’s Cancer Support Program (CSP) provides care management to members with cancer diagnoses facing healthcare barriers. CSP nurses educate members on symptom management, palliative care and advance care planning, address psychosocial needs and close gaps in care. Improving health equity and outcomes is a program priority. In 2023, Optum analyzed outpatient claims for 24,221 Medicaid members with cancer and found that rural members visit emergency departments (ED) 31% more than urban members. As part of a CSP quality and outcomes assessment, we aimed to understand CSP’s impact on ED utilization within a high-risk rural Medicaid population. Methods: Beginning 1/1/23, Medicaid members in rural zip codes with an active cancer diagnosis were stratified as high- or low-risk based on diagnosis and clinical factors. High-risk members were invited to participate in CSP and receive individualized telephonic care management. 2023 outpatient medical claims were evaluated, and rural ED visit rates were compared for high-risk CSP participants and non-participants for approximately 4 months (average CSP engagement) after CSP enrollment or identification (non-participants). Population demographics were tested via a Mood's median test; ED visits per thousand members per year (PTMPY)—engaged, non-engaged, and difference in means—was tested via a 10,000-iteration bootstrap. Results: The study population included 421 members stratified as high-risk. Of those, 38% (161) enrolled in CSP. Reasons for non-enrollment included inability to reach the member (61%) and member refused (39%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups’ demographic composition (all variables had p ≥ 0.05). Under a 10,000-iteration bootstrap, there were 2,696 ED visits PTMPY, 80% CI [2,258, 3,150] in the participant group and 3,427 ED visits PTMPY, 80% CI [2,904, 3,974] in the non-participant group. The difference in means between the groups was 730 ED visits PTMPY, 80% CI [52, 1,421]. Conclusions: Rural Medicaid members enrolled in CSP experienced lower ED visit rates, suggesting that care management may be effective at reducing ED utilization within rural populations that lack access to wraparound oncology services. Limitations of this study include small sample size and potential enrollment bias. Further analysis is underway to increase the study sample size and identify other factors that may be impacted by care management, thereby improving healthcare equity.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
Optum (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.