Spillover effects of Medicaid expansion on insurance coverage among low-income older individuals newly diagnosed with cancer.

168 Background: Medicaid expansion is associated with increased insurance coverage and improved health outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer < 65 years. Although not the target population, individuals ≥65 years may benefit from Medicaid expansion through “welcome mat” effects – the indirect increase in enrollment, particularly those with low income eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare (dual-eligible). This study aims to examine the associations of Medicaid expansion with Medicaid coverage, including both dual-eligible and Medicaid-only, among individuals diagnosed with cancer. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients ≥65 years newly diagnosed with cancer between 2010-2019 with income below 138% federal poverty level. We applied a quasi-experimental design, the difference-in-difference approach, with multivariable linear probability models to compare the changes in the percentage of dual-eligible or Medicaid-only coverage post (vs. pre) Medicaid expansion in expansion v. non-expansion states. Analyses were also stratified by key demographic characteristics. Results: A total of 256,997 patients with cancer were identified, with 136,373 patients from expansion states and 120,624 patients from non-expansion states. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, the percentage of patients with dual or Medicaid-only coverage increased from 16.84 to 18.09 in expansion states and decreased from 14.14 to 12.62 in non-expansion states, resulting in a net increase of 2.11 percentage points (ppt, 95% confidence interval: 1.55, 2.67) associated with Medicaid expansion. Differences were more pronounced among patients diagnosed with stage III-IV cancers (DD: 2.53 ppt, 95%CI: 1.58, 3.48), racialized as non-Hispanic Black (DD: 3.71 ppt, 95%CI: 2.70, 4.73), residing in metropolitan areas (DD: 2.77 ppt, 95%CI: 2.08, 3.47), with two or more comorbidities (DD: 4.14 ppt, 95%CI: 2.47, 5.80), and treated in comprehensive (DD: 2.98 ppt, 95%CI: 2.02, 3.94) or academic cancer centers (DD: 3.31 ppt, 95%CI: 2.14, 4.49). Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in Medicaid enrollment among patients diagnosed with cancer at 65 or older, suggesting spillover benefits of Medicaid expansion in supporting low-income elderly populations with cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.168
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spillover effects of Medicaid expansion on insurance coverage among low-income older individuals newly diagnosed with cancer.

K. Robin Yabroff, Xu Ji, Kewei Sylvia Shi, Xuesong Han
JCO Oncology Practice
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Spillover effects of Medicaid expansion on insurance coverage among low-income older individuals newly diagnosed with cancer.

K. Robin Yabroff, Xu Ji, Kewei Sylvia Shi, Xuesong Han
article en

Abstract

168 Background: Medicaid expansion is associated with increased insurance coverage and improved health outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer < 65 years. Although not the target population, individuals ≥65 years may benefit from Medicaid expansion through “welcome mat” effects – the indirect increase in enrollment, particularly those with low income eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare (dual-eligible). This study aims to examine the associations of Medicaid expansion with Medicaid coverage, including both dual-eligible and Medicaid-only, among individuals diagnosed with cancer. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients ≥65 years newly diagnosed with cancer between 2010-2019 with income below 138% federal poverty level. We applied a quasi-experimental design, the difference-in-difference approach, with multivariable linear probability models to compare the changes in the percentage of dual-eligible or Medicaid-only coverage post (vs. pre) Medicaid expansion in expansion v. non-expansion states. Analyses were also stratified by key demographic characteristics. Results: A total of 256,997 patients with cancer were identified, with 136,373 patients from expansion states and 120,624 patients from non-expansion states. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, the percentage of patients with dual or Medicaid-only coverage increased from 16.84 to 18.09 in expansion states and decreased from 14.14 to 12.62 in non-expansion states, resulting in a net increase of 2.11 percentage points (ppt, 95% confidence interval: 1.55, 2.67) associated with Medicaid expansion. Differences were more pronounced among patients diagnosed with stage III-IV cancers (DD: 2.53 ppt, 95%CI: 1.58, 3.48), racialized as non-Hispanic Black (DD: 3.71 ppt, 95%CI: 2.70, 4.73), residing in metropolitan areas (DD: 2.77 ppt, 95%CI: 2.08, 3.47), with two or more comorbidities (DD: 4.14 ppt, 95%CI: 2.47, 5.80), and treated in comprehensive (DD: 2.98 ppt, 95%CI: 2.02, 3.94) or academic cancer centers (DD: 3.31 ppt, 95%CI: 2.14, 4.49). Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in Medicaid enrollment among patients diagnosed with cancer at 65 or older, suggesting spillover benefits of Medicaid expansion in supporting low-income elderly populations with cancer.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
American Cancer Society (US), Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.