Exploring the meaning of “a good day” for individuals living with advanced cancer: A qualitative interview study.

249 Background: More people are living longer with stage IV cancer due to advances in cancer treatments. However, individuals living with advanced cancer must navigate dynamic treatment schedules, side effects, fear of progression, and uncertainty, resulting in unique day-to-day experiences that may be poorly understood by their health care team. The goal of this project was to better understand the activities, behaviors, and experiences that characterize a “good day” versus a “bad day” among individuals living with advanced cancer. Methods: Twenty participants with stage IV cancer were enrolled (mean 63 years old, range 41-75; 65% female; 65% White and 35% Black; mean 1.5 years since Stage IV diagnosis, range 9 days to 7.5 years). Participants completed semi-structured interviews which involved rating the quality of their day yesterday from 1-5 (1 = very bad and 5 = very good) and characterizing their experiences and activities during the day. Participants were also asked to describe a theoretical ‘very good day’ versus a ‘very bad day’ for them personally, as well as advice they would give to another patient with advanced cancer about how to make a day better. Interview transcripts were reviewed to identify common themes across participants. Results: Interviews revealed that “good days” were associated with feeling like oneself (feeling symptom-free, in control, like pre-cancer self), bringing oneself to engage in activities that bring personal wellness, feeling connected to others (spending quality time with others, helping others, feeling supported and understood by others), feeling accomplished (getting things done, reaching goals), and practicing positive thought patterns (gratitude, reframing success, letting go). On the other hand, loss of control, uncertainty/unpredictability, disruptive physical symptoms, negative experiences with health care, and inability to reach one’s goals were common on “bad days.” When asked what they felt most grateful for yesterday, some participants cited their support system, kids, and grandkids, but the majority of participants reported feeling most grateful for simply living another day, good or bad. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that days on which individuals with advanced cancer are able to engage in activities that give them a sense of normalcy, control, self-identity, and connection to others are better than days without these activities. Findings also suggest that what defines a “good day” looks different between individuals with stage IV cancer. Understanding these individuals’ values and priorities may help care teams support people with advanced cancer to optimize their quality of life and functioning and navigate treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.249
Primary Topic
Family Support in Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the meaning of “a good day” for individuals living with advanced cancer: A qualitative interview study.

Jennifer Fedor, Krina C. Durica, Carissa A. Low, Christianna Bartel et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Family Support in Illness
article

Exploring the meaning of “a good day” for individuals living with advanced cancer: A qualitative interview study.

Jennifer Fedor, Krina C. Durica, Carissa A. Low, Christianna Bartel, Leeann Chen, David Lazris, Svea Cheng
article en

Abstract

249 Background: More people are living longer with stage IV cancer due to advances in cancer treatments. However, individuals living with advanced cancer must navigate dynamic treatment schedules, side effects, fear of progression, and uncertainty, resulting in unique day-to-day experiences that may be poorly understood by their health care team. The goal of this project was to better understand the activities, behaviors, and experiences that characterize a “good day” versus a “bad day” among individuals living with advanced cancer. Methods: Twenty participants with stage IV cancer were enrolled (mean 63 years old, range 41-75; 65% female; 65% White and 35% Black; mean 1.5 years since Stage IV diagnosis, range 9 days to 7.5 years). Participants completed semi-structured interviews which involved rating the quality of their day yesterday from 1-5 (1 = very bad and 5 = very good) and characterizing their experiences and activities during the day. Participants were also asked to describe a theoretical ‘very good day’ versus a ‘very bad day’ for them personally, as well as advice they would give to another patient with advanced cancer about how to make a day better. Interview transcripts were reviewed to identify common themes across participants. Results: Interviews revealed that “good days” were associated with feeling like oneself (feeling symptom-free, in control, like pre-cancer self), bringing oneself to engage in activities that bring personal wellness, feeling connected to others (spending quality time with others, helping others, feeling supported and understood by others), feeling accomplished (getting things done, reaching goals), and practicing positive thought patterns (gratitude, reframing success, letting go). On the other hand, loss of control, uncertainty/unpredictability, disruptive physical symptoms, negative experiences with health care, and inability to reach one’s goals were common on “bad days.” When asked what they felt most grateful for yesterday, some participants cited their support system, kids, and grandkids, but the majority of participants reported feeling most grateful for simply living another day, good or bad. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that days on which individuals with advanced cancer are able to engage in activities that give them a sense of normalcy, control, self-identity, and connection to others are better than days without these activities. Findings also suggest that what defines a “good day” looks different between individuals with stage IV cancer. Understanding these individuals’ values and priorities may help care teams support people with advanced cancer to optimize their quality of life and functioning and navigate treatment decisions.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
University of Pittsburgh (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Family Support in Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.