Health care contact days in older adults enrolled in SWOG cancer clinical trials.

64 Background: Health care contact days—days with health care contact outside the home—are a measure of how much of a patient’s life is consumed by health care. This number of contact days are especially relevant for older adults with advanced cancer facing limited survival. One concern is that patients with different sociodemographic and clinical backgrounds may be at particular risk of increased contact days. Thus, there is a critical need to understand factors associated with contact days. Methods: We linked data from 6 SWOG trials in advanced cancer to Medicare claims data. These trials encompassed a variety of primary cancer types [prostate (S9916, S0421), lung (S0003, S0124, S0819), and pancreas (S0205)]. Health care contact days (days with ambulatory, emergency department, inpatient, or facility-based care) in the first 12 months were calculated using Medicare database files. A day with >1 source of contact counted as 1. We examined sociodemographic (age, race, ethnicity, sex, insurance status, rurality, area deprivation index) and clinical (prognostic risk, cancer type, performance status) predictors of contact days, using negative binomial regression, with a log link and clustering by study ID, including an offset variable for duration of observation. We examined predictors in univariate and multivariable analysis. We report relative risk (RRs) estimates and 95% CI. Results: We included 1,429 patients (median age, 71 years, 7.6% Black, 2.7% Hispanic, 21.4% female, and 23.5% rural residence). Of these, 741 (51.9%) patients died in the first year. The median number of contact days was 48, out of a median of 350 days of observation. At a trial level, median percentage of contact days ranged from 14% (prostate) to 27% (lung). The most common sources of contact days were ambulatory clinician visits (median=17), tests (median=12), and treatments (median=11). In multivariable regression, factors associated with increased contact days included increasing age (per year, RR=1.02 [1.01-1.02], p<.001), insurance status (Medicare alone or with Private or Medicaid insurance, vs Military/VA, none, or other insurance, RR=2.47 [2.16-2.83], p<.001), higher prognostic risk score (RR=1.14 [1.04-1.25], p=.004), and type of cancer (pancreas, RR=1.69 [1.51-1.89] and lung, RR=1.69 [1.54-1.85] vs prostate, p<.001 for both). Conclusions: This novel linkage of trial and claims data to evaluate contact days and associated factors found that older trial participants spent up to one in four days with health care contact. Ambulatory appointments were the most common source of contact days. Encouragingly, rural residence and neighborhood deprivation were not associated with contact days, increasing confidence that participants from diverse geographic areas may receive equitable care in trials. These data highlight the frequency of contact days for trial participants, while identifying factors to consider when benchmarking contact days.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.64
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health care contact days in older adults enrolled in SWOG cancer clinical trials.

Cathee Till, Arjun Gupta, Riha Vaidya, Joseph M. Unger et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Health care contact days in older adults enrolled in SWOG cancer clinical trials.

Cathee Till, Arjun Gupta, Riha Vaidya, Joseph M. Unger, Dawn L. Hershman
article en

Abstract

64 Background: Health care contact days—days with health care contact outside the home—are a measure of how much of a patient’s life is consumed by health care. This number of contact days are especially relevant for older adults with advanced cancer facing limited survival. One concern is that patients with different sociodemographic and clinical backgrounds may be at particular risk of increased contact days. Thus, there is a critical need to understand factors associated with contact days. Methods: We linked data from 6 SWOG trials in advanced cancer to Medicare claims data. These trials encompassed a variety of primary cancer types [prostate (S9916, S0421), lung (S0003, S0124, S0819), and pancreas (S0205)]. Health care contact days (days with ambulatory, emergency department, inpatient, or facility-based care) in the first 12 months were calculated using Medicare database files. A day with >1 source of contact counted as 1. We examined sociodemographic (age, race, ethnicity, sex, insurance status, rurality, area deprivation index) and clinical (prognostic risk, cancer type, performance status) predictors of contact days, using negative binomial regression, with a log link and clustering by study ID, including an offset variable for duration of observation. We examined predictors in univariate and multivariable analysis. We report relative risk (RRs) estimates and 95% CI. Results: We included 1,429 patients (median age, 71 years, 7.6% Black, 2.7% Hispanic, 21.4% female, and 23.5% rural residence). Of these, 741 (51.9%) patients died in the first year. The median number of contact days was 48, out of a median of 350 days of observation. At a trial level, median percentage of contact days ranged from 14% (prostate) to 27% (lung). The most common sources of contact days were ambulatory clinician visits (median=17), tests (median=12), and treatments (median=11). In multivariable regression, factors associated with increased contact days included increasing age (per year, RR=1.02 [1.01-1.02], p<.001), insurance status (Medicare alone or with Private or Medicaid insurance, vs Military/VA, none, or other insurance, RR=2.47 [2.16-2.83], p<.001), higher prognostic risk score (RR=1.14 [1.04-1.25], p=.004), and type of cancer (pancreas, RR=1.69 [1.51-1.89] and lung, RR=1.69 [1.54-1.85] vs prostate, p<.001 for both). Conclusions: This novel linkage of trial and claims data to evaluate contact days and associated factors found that older trial participants spent up to one in four days with health care contact. Ambulatory appointments were the most common source of contact days. Encouragingly, rural residence and neighborhood deprivation were not associated with contact days, increasing confidence that participants from diverse geographic areas may receive equitable care in trials. These data highlight the frequency of contact days for trial participants, while identifying factors to consider when benchmarking contact days.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
University of Minnesota (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), SWOG Cancer Research Network (US)
Hope Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.