Impact of expediting formulary oncology drug approvals at a tertiary care safety net hospital.

410 Background: Advances in drug development and novel clinical trials have resulted in accelerated FDA approvals for oncology agents. These approvals often outpace the speed at which these agents are made “formulary” by hospitals. Non-formulary agents at most organizations need to undergo rigorous regulatory processes before their use and even after the approval for use, ordering them in the EMR poses a significant burden to both providers and pharmacists. Providers need to manually create treatment plans consisting of labs, medications, diluents, and infusion rates for non-formulary agents, consuming valuable time and leaving room for errors requiring extensive pharmacy review. Oncology agents can be considered non-formulary for at least 1 year post-FDA approval before they are approved by the pharmacy and therapeutics (P & T) committee and only 1 agent is approved per meeting. To expedite the formulary approval of oncology drugs, the 1 drug approval per meeting and 1 year post-FDA approval time limit rules were lifted within our institution. Methods: In September 2023, 8 oncology drugs were approved for formulary use by the P & T committee and their pre-built drug templates were established in the EMR. We obtained baseline data to order such non-formulary drugs through EMR prior to formulary approval and when drug templates were not pre-built, requiring manual order entry by providers and review by pharmacists. Baseline data was compared with data obtained post formulary approval and implementation of the pre-builtdrug template. We also created a process map to identify workflow inefficiencies in the formulary drug approval process for further optimization. Results: After the implementation of the pre-built oncology drug templatesand 8 simultaneous formulary drug approvals, the average total time required by physicians and pharmacists was reduced from 97 minutes to 12 minutes per order. The average number of edits made by pharmacists during order review changed from 21 to 4 per treatment order (Table). The use of pre-built drug templates resulted in an 87% reduction in time spent ordering and reviewing agents and an 81% reduction in edits made per drug order. Conclusions: Integration of treatment protocol building quickly into EMR by expediting formulary drug approval significantly reduced physician and staff burden in oncology care at a safety net hospital. Health systems should adopt innovative processes to streamline the formulary approval process and use pre-built drug templates, minimizing staff fatigue and increasing patient safety. Breakdown for provider order entry and pharmacist review with and without drug template. Manual Entry During Non-Formulary Period Template Entry after Formulary Approval Average provider order entry time (mins) 75 6 Average pharmacist review time (mins) 22 6 Average total time taken per order (mins) 97 12 Average edits/order by pharmacist 21 4 mins=time in minutes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.410
Primary Topic
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of expediting formulary oncology drug approvals at a tertiary care safety net hospital.

Ahan Bhatt, Jennifer Wu, Sarita Mohanty
JCO Oncology Practice
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
article

Impact of expediting formulary oncology drug approvals at a tertiary care safety net hospital.

Ahan Bhatt, Jennifer Wu, Sarita Mohanty
article en

Abstract

410 Background: Advances in drug development and novel clinical trials have resulted in accelerated FDA approvals for oncology agents. These approvals often outpace the speed at which these agents are made “formulary” by hospitals. Non-formulary agents at most organizations need to undergo rigorous regulatory processes before their use and even after the approval for use, ordering them in the EMR poses a significant burden to both providers and pharmacists. Providers need to manually create treatment plans consisting of labs, medications, diluents, and infusion rates for non-formulary agents, consuming valuable time and leaving room for errors requiring extensive pharmacy review. Oncology agents can be considered non-formulary for at least 1 year post-FDA approval before they are approved by the pharmacy and therapeutics (P & T) committee and only 1 agent is approved per meeting. To expedite the formulary approval of oncology drugs, the 1 drug approval per meeting and 1 year post-FDA approval time limit rules were lifted within our institution. Methods: In September 2023, 8 oncology drugs were approved for formulary use by the P & T committee and their pre-built drug templates were established in the EMR. We obtained baseline data to order such non-formulary drugs through EMR prior to formulary approval and when drug templates were not pre-built, requiring manual order entry by providers and review by pharmacists. Baseline data was compared with data obtained post formulary approval and implementation of the pre-builtdrug template. We also created a process map to identify workflow inefficiencies in the formulary drug approval process for further optimization. Results: After the implementation of the pre-built oncology drug templatesand 8 simultaneous formulary drug approvals, the average total time required by physicians and pharmacists was reduced from 97 minutes to 12 minutes per order. The average number of edits made by pharmacists during order review changed from 21 to 4 per treatment order (Table). The use of pre-built drug templates resulted in an 87% reduction in time spent ordering and reviewing agents and an 81% reduction in edits made per drug order. Conclusions: Integration of treatment protocol building quickly into EMR by expediting formulary drug approval significantly reduced physician and staff burden in oncology care at a safety net hospital. Health systems should adopt innovative processes to streamline the formulary approval process and use pre-built drug templates, minimizing staff fatigue and increasing patient safety. Breakdown for provider order entry and pharmacist review with and without drug template. Manual Entry During Non-Formulary Period Template Entry after Formulary Approval Average provider order entry time (mins) 75 6 Average pharmacist review time (mins) 22 6 Average total time taken per order (mins) 97 12 Average edits/order by pharmacist 21 4 mins=time in minutes.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
Jacobi Medical Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Bellevue Hospital Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.