Inequalities in colon cancer treatment in Uruguay: Does age have a say?

125 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer in men and women in Uruguay. Survival from CRC is known to be worse in those aged 65 years and older, despite more than 70% of cases occurring in this age group. It has been said that elderly cancer patients are often under-treated compared to younger ones, and that this unequal access to treatment in practice, despite universal access in theory, accounts for at least some of the reported survival difference. A better understanding of age-related inequalities in treatment would help to inform interventions to improve cancer control, therefore a retrospective study was undertaken to investigate if there are age-related inequalities in CRC care in Uruguay. Methods: Data on age, sex, tumor site and stage and treatments received (cancer-directed surgery and chemotherapy) were obtained for 1372 patients diagnosed with CRC. Likelihood of receipt of 1) cancer-directed surgery, 2) chemotherapy in surgical patients, 3) chemotherapy in non-surgical patients by age, adjusting for sex, cancer stage, was examined. Results: More than two-thirds (67%) of our population were aged 60 years or older at diagnosis and a slightly higher proportion were men (53%). Seventy six percent received cancer directed surgery, either in a curative or palliative intent. When analyzing patients with stage I-III cancers, 81% of patients received curative intent surgery. Those in the oldest age group (80+ years) were significantly less likely to be operated than those in the <60 years age group (p 0.002) specially if the tumor was in the sub peritoneal rectum. In relation to receipt of chemotherapy in surgical patients, similar age patterns were observed, although in a much more extreme manner (p <0.001). Increasing age was also strongly associated with reduced likelihood of receiving systemic therapy, with a higher percentage of patients <60 years old receiving at least palliative chemotherapy in comparison to the 80+ year age group (p <0,001). No differences in relation to gender or tumour location were observed. Conclusions: Age remains a major factor in treatment decisions. Research is needed both to identify the most effective treatment for colon cancer in older populations and to understand clinicians’ decision-making processes to ensure equitable access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.125
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequalities in colon cancer treatment in Uruguay: Does age have a say?

Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, Gabriel Krygier, Mauricio Cuello, Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Inequalities in colon cancer treatment in Uruguay: Does age have a say?

Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, Gabriel Krygier, Mauricio Cuello, Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez, Santiago Fontes, Megan Berry
article en

Abstract

125 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer in men and women in Uruguay. Survival from CRC is known to be worse in those aged 65 years and older, despite more than 70% of cases occurring in this age group. It has been said that elderly cancer patients are often under-treated compared to younger ones, and that this unequal access to treatment in practice, despite universal access in theory, accounts for at least some of the reported survival difference. A better understanding of age-related inequalities in treatment would help to inform interventions to improve cancer control, therefore a retrospective study was undertaken to investigate if there are age-related inequalities in CRC care in Uruguay. Methods: Data on age, sex, tumor site and stage and treatments received (cancer-directed surgery and chemotherapy) were obtained for 1372 patients diagnosed with CRC. Likelihood of receipt of 1) cancer-directed surgery, 2) chemotherapy in surgical patients, 3) chemotherapy in non-surgical patients by age, adjusting for sex, cancer stage, was examined. Results: More than two-thirds (67%) of our population were aged 60 years or older at diagnosis and a slightly higher proportion were men (53%). Seventy six percent received cancer directed surgery, either in a curative or palliative intent. When analyzing patients with stage I-III cancers, 81% of patients received curative intent surgery. Those in the oldest age group (80+ years) were significantly less likely to be operated than those in the <60 years age group (p 0.002) specially if the tumor was in the sub peritoneal rectum. In relation to receipt of chemotherapy in surgical patients, similar age patterns were observed, although in a much more extreme manner (p <0.001). Increasing age was also strongly associated with reduced likelihood of receiving systemic therapy, with a higher percentage of patients <60 years old receiving at least palliative chemotherapy in comparison to the 80+ year age group (p <0,001). No differences in relation to gender or tumour location were observed. Conclusions: Age remains a major factor in treatment decisions. Research is needed both to identify the most effective treatment for colon cancer in older populations and to understand clinicians’ decision-making processes to ensure equitable access.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 20(10_suppl)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Hospital de Clínicas (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.