Disentangling SMEFT and UV contributions in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http:/

LHC searches have revealed that the Higgs boson decay to a photon pair is nearly consistent with the Standard Model (SM), whereas recently, there is evidence for the decay of the Higgs boson to a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>Z</a:mi></a:math> boson and a photon. These decays are governed by the same set of Wilson coefficients at the tree level in Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT). In this study, we aim to explain this potential discrepancy between the decays <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>h</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">→</c:mo><c:mi>γ</c:mi><c:mi>γ</c:mi></c:math> and <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi>h</f:mi><f:mo stretchy="false">→</f:mo><f:mi>Z</f:mi><f:mi>γ</f:mi></f:math>. We conduct a model-independent analysis in SMEFT to determine the magnitude and features of the Wilson coefficients required to account for the observed distinction between the two signal strengths. Following this, we adopt a top-down approach, considering all single- and two-field extensions of the SM, including scalars and fermions, as candidates for new interactions. We perform the matching of these models to one loop using automated packages and compare the models’ predictions regarding <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>h</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">→</i:mo><i:mi>Z</i:mi><i:mi>γ</i:mi></i:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.055041
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling SMEFT and UV contributions in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http:/

Kostas Mantzaropoulos
4 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
2.64
article

Disentangling SMEFT and UV contributions in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http:/

Kostas Mantzaropoulos
article en
4 citations

Abstract

LHC searches have revealed that the Higgs boson decay to a photon pair is nearly consistent with the Standard Model (SM), whereas recently, there is evidence for the decay of the Higgs boson to a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>Z</a:mi></a:math> boson and a photon. These decays are governed by the same set of Wilson coefficients at the tree level in Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT). In this study, we aim to explain this potential discrepancy between the decays <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>h</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">→</c:mo><c:mi>γ</c:mi><c:mi>γ</c:mi></c:math> and <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi>h</f:mi><f:mo stretchy="false">→</f:mo><f:mi>Z</f:mi><f:mi>γ</f:mi></f:math>. We conduct a model-independent analysis in SMEFT to determine the magnitude and features of the Wilson coefficients required to account for the observed distinction between the two signal strengths. Following this, we adopt a top-down approach, considering all single- and two-field extensions of the SM, including scalars and fermions, as candidates for new interactions. We perform the matching of these models to one loop using automated packages and compare the models’ predictions regarding <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>h</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">→</i:mo><i:mi>Z</i:mi><i:mi>γ</i:mi></i:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(5)
University of Ioannina (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.