Pengembangan Tipologi Pesantren: Sebuah Kritik atas Tipologi Dhofier dan Ziemek

The development of Islamic boarding schools is inevitable. Facts show that Islamic boarding schools have developed over time. The development referred to in this context is the development of the institutions within them. From what was initially only a kiai and a mosque, it continued to develop until there was a higher education institution. Throughout the history of the development of Islamic boarding schools, only two serious works have been found that map Islamic boarding schools into several types. The two figures are Zamakhsyari Dhofier and Manfred Ziemek. They have different opinions about the typology of Islamic boarding schools. The first mentions four typologies, while the second mentions five typologies of Islamic boarding schools. Ziemek seems to be dissatisfied with the typology of Islamic boarding schools proposed by Dhofier, so he developed it into five. This article was written in order to further develop the typology of Islamic boarding schools that they did. The development of this Islamic boarding school typology was carried out through a literature study by conducting a manuscript analysis, namely a comparison between one literature and another literature to support and reject the arguments built by the two figures. Through this literature analysis, it can be concluded that the typology of Islamic boarding schools can be developed into six types, namely types A-D remain, while the school and college indicators in Ziemek's type E version are separated, namely the college indicator is removed from type E and lowered to type F.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Multidisiplin Ibrahimy
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35316/jummy.v2i1.5428
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengembangan Tipologi Pesantren: Sebuah Kritik atas Tipologi Dhofier dan Ziemek

M. Holil, Asmuki Asmuki, Sokhibul Mighfar, Musyaffa Rafiqie
Jurnal Multidisiplin Ibrahimy
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Pengembangan Tipologi Pesantren: Sebuah Kritik atas Tipologi Dhofier dan Ziemek

M. Holil, Asmuki Asmuki, Sokhibul Mighfar, Musyaffa Rafiqie
article en

Abstract

The development of Islamic boarding schools is inevitable. Facts show that Islamic boarding schools have developed over time. The development referred to in this context is the development of the institutions within them. From what was initially only a kiai and a mosque, it continued to develop until there was a higher education institution. Throughout the history of the development of Islamic boarding schools, only two serious works have been found that map Islamic boarding schools into several types. The two figures are Zamakhsyari Dhofier and Manfred Ziemek. They have different opinions about the typology of Islamic boarding schools. The first mentions four typologies, while the second mentions five typologies of Islamic boarding schools. Ziemek seems to be dissatisfied with the typology of Islamic boarding schools proposed by Dhofier, so he developed it into five. This article was written in order to further develop the typology of Islamic boarding schools that they did. The development of this Islamic boarding school typology was carried out through a literature study by conducting a manuscript analysis, namely a comparison between one literature and another literature to support and reject the arguments built by the two figures. Through this literature analysis, it can be concluded that the typology of Islamic boarding schools can be developed into six types, namely types A-D remain, while the school and college indicators in Ziemek's type E version are separated, namely the college indicator is removed from type E and lowered to type F.

Jurnal Multidisiplin IbrahimyVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.