Trust, but Verify: Evaluating Developer Behavior in Mitigating Security Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Software Projects

This study investigates vulnerabilities in dependencies of sampled open-source software (OSS) projects, the relationship between these and overall project security, and how developers’ behaviors and practices influence their mitigation. Through analysis of OSS projects, we have identified common issues in outdated or unmaintained dependencies, including pointer dereferences and array bounds violations, that pose significant security risks. We have also examined developer responses to formal verifier reports, noting a tendency to dismiss potential issues as false positives, which can lead to overlooked vulnerabilities. Our results suggest that reducing the number of direct dependencies and prioritizing well-established libraries with strong security records are effective strategies for enhancing the software security landscape. Notably, four vulnerabilities were fixed as a result of this study, demonstrating the effectiveness of our mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/sbseg.2024.241765
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust, but Verify: Evaluating Developer Behavior in Mitigating Security Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Software Projects

Bruno Farias, Janislley Oliveira de Sousa, Lucas C. Cordeiro, Eddie B. de Lima Filho
Software Engineering Research
article

Trust, but Verify: Evaluating Developer Behavior in Mitigating Security Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Software Projects

Bruno Farias, Janislley Oliveira de Sousa, Lucas C. Cordeiro, Eddie B. de Lima Filho
article en

Abstract

This study investigates vulnerabilities in dependencies of sampled open-source software (OSS) projects, the relationship between these and overall project security, and how developers’ behaviors and practices influence their mitigation. Through analysis of OSS projects, we have identified common issues in outdated or unmaintained dependencies, including pointer dereferences and array bounds violations, that pose significant security risks. We have also examined developer responses to formal verifier reports, noting a tendency to dismiss potential issues as false positives, which can lead to overlooked vulnerabilities. Our results suggest that reducing the number of direct dependencies and prioritizing well-established libraries with strong security records are effective strategies for enhancing the software security landscape. Notably, four vulnerabilities were fixed as a result of this study, demonstrating the effectiveness of our mitigation strategies.

University of Manchester (GB), Şifa University (TR), TPV Technology (China) (CN)
UK Research and Innovation, Samsung, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.