Dissemination and outcome reporting bias in clinical malaria intervention trials: a cross-sectional analysis
Non-dissemination remains a significant issue in interventional malaria research, with most trials failing to meet WHO standards for timely dissemination of summary results and peer-reviewed journal publications. Additionally, outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent across malaria publications. To address these challenges, it is crucial to implement strategies that enhance the timely reporting of research findings and reduce both non-dissemination and outcome reporting bias.
Authors
- Rob W. van der Pluijm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7040-5447)
- Thomas Hänscheid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6353-9132)
- Benjamin J Visser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-9662)
- Patrick H. P. Soentjens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-1199)
- Martin P. Grobusch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-1099)
- Claire Ruiz del Portal Luyten
- Lydia Pool
Institutions
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Institut Pasteur (FR)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- Centre de Recherche Médicales de Lambaréné (GA)
- German Institute for Disaster Medicine (DE)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SL)
- Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Malaria Journal
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05115-6
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.46