Comparative Analysis for Bejerman Versus Kinematic Methods for Slope Stability Assessment
In a previous study, the stability of eleven Haibat Sultan Road Crossing stations was assessed using Bejerman's Method. Amongst these 11 studied stations with the highest potential for slope failures, four stations (4, 5, 6, and 9) could be evaluated using kinematic analyses in another previous paper. This study focused on comparing the analysis results of these four stations using the Kinematic Method with those assessed by Bejerman’s Method. The outcome showed negative relations, whereby an inverse correlation between the Landslide Possibility Index and the Factor of Safety has been found. Such a comparison enables us to use extrapolations to analyze the missing data. Both sets of data from the two methods of analysis, which were obtained by the two methods, were collected, compared, and discussed.
Authors
- Varoujan K. Sissakian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9840-5422)
- Mark J. Vanarelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-6791)
- Hassan O. Omer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0232-5653)
- Hamed M. Jassim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-8035)
Institutions
- New Mexico State University Carlsbad (US)
- Komar University of Science and Technology (IQ)
- Deventer Ziekenhuis (NL)
- Tishk International University (IQ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Iraqi Geological Journal
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.57.2c.4ms-2024-9-12
- Primary Topic
- Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00