Risk Management in the Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Central Government Settings in France, Germany, and Italy

ABSTRACT In recent years, public organizations have come under increasing pressure to implement comprehensive risk management (RM) systems that are based on international frameworks and standards. However, little is known about whether different countries have addressed this issue in their regulatory strategies and how they have done so. To address this gap, this study conducts a cross‐country analysis and introduces and applies an analytical framework to compare the different RM approaches adopted by the central governments of France, Germany, and Italy. This comparison sheds light on the regulatory landscape in the three largest countries in the European Union and reveals the diverse RM frameworks with varying focuses, drivers, designs, and levels of integration. Although each country has unique nuances in its approaches, commonality is the primary perception of risk as a threat. This stance, although understandable in the context of financial risks, calls for a shift toward viewing risk as an opportunity, thus promoting a balanced approach that goes beyond mere compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Accountability and Management
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12416
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Management in the Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Central Government Settings in France, Germany, and Italy

Emanuele Padovani, Silvia Iacuzzi, Léonard Gourbier, Iris Saliterer
4 citations
Financial Accountability and Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
3.42
article

Risk Management in the Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Central Government Settings in France, Germany, and Italy

Emanuele Padovani, Silvia Iacuzzi, Léonard Gourbier, Iris Saliterer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, public organizations have come under increasing pressure to implement comprehensive risk management (RM) systems that are based on international frameworks and standards. However, little is known about whether different countries have addressed this issue in their regulatory strategies and how they have done so. To address this gap, this study conducts a cross‐country analysis and introduces and applies an analytical framework to compare the different RM approaches adopted by the central governments of France, Germany, and Italy. This comparison sheds light on the regulatory landscape in the three largest countries in the European Union and reveals the diverse RM frameworks with varying focuses, drivers, designs, and levels of integration. Although each country has unique nuances in its approaches, commonality is the primary perception of risk as a threat. This stance, although understandable in the context of financial risks, calls for a shift toward viewing risk as an opportunity, thus promoting a balanced approach that goes beyond mere compliance.

Financial Accountability and ManagementVol. 41(2)
University of Udine (IT), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR), University of Bologna (IT)
Masarykova Univerzita, EEA Grants/Norway Grants
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public Policy and Administration Research
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.