Audiological Characteristics of a Sample of Adults With Misophonia

Audiological data on individuals with misophonia are lacking. In this article, we present results from audiological testing on 60 adults with self-reported misophonia. Most had normal peripheral hearing sensitivity based on pure-tone audiometry and DPOAE measures; some had difficulties with sound sensitivities and understanding speech-in-noise, self-report indicated problems with hyperacusis, tinnitus, and hearing difficulty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Audiology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_aja-24-00111
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audiological Characteristics of a Sample of Adults With Misophonia

Julie M. Petersen, Mercedes G. Woolley, Michael P. Twohig, Guadalupe G. San Miguel et al.
8 citations
American Journal of Audiology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
2.74
article

Audiological Characteristics of a Sample of Adults With Misophonia

Julie M. Petersen, Mercedes G. Woolley, Michael P. Twohig, Guadalupe G. San Miguel, Karen Muñoz, Doris Velasquez, Diana Ortiz
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Audiological data on individuals with misophonia are lacking. In this article, we present results from audiological testing on 60 adults with self-reported misophonia. Most had normal peripheral hearing sensitivity based on pure-tone audiometry and DPOAE measures; some had difficulties with sound sensitivities and understanding speech-in-noise, self-report indicated problems with hyperacusis, tinnitus, and hearing difficulty.

American Journal of AudiologyVol. 33(4)
Utah State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
2.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.