Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A 2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency. • Proposing a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria decision making method by combining IFAHP, SMAA, and VIKOR models. • Considering the uncertainty in decision making environment and the progression of decision making process. • Introducing the SMAA theory to deterministic multi-criteria decision making model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.068
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

Jieyu Li, Qingwen Lü, Chenhui Jiang, Yunling Li et al.
2 citations
Energy Reports
Electric Power System Optimization
0.42
article

Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

Jieyu Li, Qingwen Lü, Chenhui Jiang, Yunling Li, Weifeng Liu, Xigang Xing, Xuning Guo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A 2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency. • Proposing a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria decision making method by combining IFAHP, SMAA, and VIKOR models. • Considering the uncertainty in decision making environment and the progression of decision making process. • Introducing the SMAA theory to deterministic multi-criteria decision making model.

Energy ReportsVol. 12
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Songjiang District Central Hospital (CN), Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Electric Power System Optimization
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.