When energy transfer kills free charge generation

Energy transfer between materials in organic photovoltaics often assists energy transport to the site of free charge generation. Here we present a case where the opposite is true: dilute donor molecules sensitizing a fullerene matrix. We show via a combination of time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC), femtosecond transient absorption (fsTA), and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectroscopy that fast energy transfer from the donor to the acceptor ultimately results in charge transfer, but not photoconductivity. Instead, the excited states are lost as tightly bound charge-transfer states that do not subsequently dissociate to from free charge in this system. This behavior is caused by an asymmetry in the entropy associated with charge transfer in each direction and is well described by a model in which free charge generation is governed by a combination of entropic gain and competition between multiple Marcus-like charge transfer events to a distribution of distances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3028411
Primary Topic
Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When energy transfer kills free charge generation

Joshua M. Carr, Garry Rumbles, Melissa K. Gish, Obadiah G. Reid
Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
article

When energy transfer kills free charge generation

Joshua M. Carr, Garry Rumbles, Melissa K. Gish, Obadiah G. Reid
article en

Abstract

Energy transfer between materials in organic photovoltaics often assists energy transport to the site of free charge generation. Here we present a case where the opposite is true: dilute donor molecules sensitizing a fullerene matrix. We show via a combination of time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC), femtosecond transient absorption (fsTA), and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectroscopy that fast energy transfer from the donor to the acceptor ultimately results in charge transfer, but not photoconductivity. Instead, the excited states are lost as tightly bound charge-transfer states that do not subsequently dissociate to from free charge in this system. This behavior is caused by an asymmetry in the entropy associated with charge transfer in each direction and is well described by a model in which free charge generation is governed by a combination of entropic gain and competition between multiple Marcus-like charge transfer events to a distribution of distances.

National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Renewable Energy Systems (United States) (US), Institute for Renewable Energy (Poland) (PL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.